Advertisement
The Truth About Islam
We hear so much folderol these days about Islam being a "peaceful religion." The fact is that Islam is anti-human and anti-woman - the most anti-human and anti-woman ideology on the face of the earth today. We need merely repeat a number of quotes from the Koran itself in order to prove these points. Anyone who claims the opposite is either willfully ignorant or despicably dishonest - and there are far too many people making such erroneous or deceptive assertions.
Let's start with the idiocy that Islam is "peaceful." In the first place, the record speaks for itself: Horrendous barbarism and atrocity repeatedly carried out in the name of Islam, wherever it can be found worldwide over a period of many centuries. Let us examine one of the worst examples of modern history: The horrors perpetrated in Bangladesh. No civilized human being could possibly participate in such atrocities.
tbknews.blogspot.com/2006/03...ind.html
3 million deaths and 200,000 rapes - these are the fruits of a "peaceful religion?!"
Fast forward to the millions of foaming-at-the-mouth ranters killing and threatening people worldwide over some cartoons - cartoons that accurately lampooned this hideous ideology. These are the fruits of a "peaceful religion?"
The list of atrocities done in the name of Islam is VERY LONG and includes the ongoing torture of women. Let's proceed with the fallacy that Islam is "peaceful." Here is a quote from the Koran that puts to rest that lie once and for all:
"Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate." Q 9:73
I repeat, anyone asserting otherwise is simply ignorant or a purveyor of falsehood, to say the least.
The treatment of women within Islam is absolutely ABYSMAL - and is contrived to be so, through the manmade set of "laws" found in the Koran, a book with the psychotic qualities of the Bible but none of the "entertaining" stories. It is as if the writers of the Koran set out to chronicle the most atrocious concept of God ever developed. Here is what the Koran says about women:
"Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient." Q 4:34
PLEASE read the other quotes at: www.truthbeknown.com/islamquotes.htm
This article ranks no. 1 in the world when "quotes from the koran" is googled, along with a number of other keyphrases.
I will not even go into the horrid mistreatment of boys within Muslim communities - it is a revolting aspect indeed. I have written about this awful psychopathy within Islam for many years, but many still do not know about it. Even though it is unfortunately not widely known, there is an unending epidemic of child abuse - specifically sexual abuse - within Islamic societies, starting, of course, with Mohammed's rape of his 9-year-old "bride." These facts should not be let slip by lightly, as they are the root of much of the sociopathy we are facing with the encroachment of Muslim cultures in the U.S. and elsewhere. With that increase in the U.S., we also have record numbers of emergency-room visits by little girls with their genitals hacked off, a recent case of the psycho in Georgia who cut off his 2-year-old daughter's clitoris with a pair of scissors. Fortunately, this
demented moron received 10 years - because female genital mutilation is illegal in the U.S., as it should be in any CIVILIZED country.
In my opinion, the spread of this fanatically violent and misogynistic ideology is a great threat that we all need to take very seriously. It does not bode well for the civilized world that the purveyors of barbarism are freely trampling over the term "truth." These individuals should NOT be allowed to get away with their spurious and disgraceful assertions but should be loudly called to the carpet.
We hear so much folderol these days about Islam being a "peaceful religion." The fact is that Islam is anti-human and anti-woman - the most anti-human and anti-woman ideology on the face of the earth today. We need merely repeat a number of quotes from the Koran itself in order to prove these points. Anyone who claims the opposite is either willfully ignorant or despicably dishonest - and there are far too many people making such erroneous or deceptive assertions.
Let's start with the idiocy that Islam is "peaceful." In the first place, the record speaks for itself: Horrendous barbarism and atrocity repeatedly carried out in the name of Islam, wherever it can be found worldwide over a period of many centuries. Let us examine one of the worst examples of modern history: The horrors perpetrated in Bangladesh. No civilized human being could possibly participate in such atrocities.
tbknews.blogspot.com/2006/03...ind.html
3 million deaths and 200,000 rapes - these are the fruits of a "peaceful religion?!"
Fast forward to the millions of foaming-at-the-mouth ranters killing and threatening people worldwide over some cartoons - cartoons that accurately lampooned this hideous ideology. These are the fruits of a "peaceful religion?"
The list of atrocities done in the name of Islam is VERY LONG and includes the ongoing torture of women. Let's proceed with the fallacy that Islam is "peaceful." Here is a quote from the Koran that puts to rest that lie once and for all:
"Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate." Q 9:73
I repeat, anyone asserting otherwise is simply ignorant or a purveyor of falsehood, to say the least.
The treatment of women within Islam is absolutely ABYSMAL - and is contrived to be so, through the manmade set of "laws" found in the Koran, a book with the psychotic qualities of the Bible but none of the "entertaining" stories. It is as if the writers of the Koran set out to chronicle the most atrocious concept of God ever developed. Here is what the Koran says about women:
"Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient." Q 4:34
PLEASE read the other quotes at: www.truthbeknown.com/islamquotes.htm
This article ranks no. 1 in the world when "quotes from the koran" is googled, along with a number of other keyphrases.
I will not even go into the horrid mistreatment of boys within Muslim communities - it is a revolting aspect indeed. I have written about this awful psychopathy within Islam for many years, but many still do not know about it. Even though it is unfortunately not widely known, there is an unending epidemic of child abuse - specifically sexual abuse - within Islamic societies, starting, of course, with Mohammed's rape of his 9-year-old "bride." These facts should not be let slip by lightly, as they are the root of much of the sociopathy we are facing with the encroachment of Muslim cultures in the U.S. and elsewhere. With that increase in the U.S., we also have record numbers of emergency-room visits by little girls with their genitals hacked off, a recent case of the psycho in Georgia who cut off his 2-year-old daughter's clitoris with a pair of scissors. Fortunately, this
demented moron received 10 years - because female genital mutilation is illegal in the U.S., as it should be in any CIVILIZED country.
In my opinion, the spread of this fanatically violent and misogynistic ideology is a great threat that we all need to take very seriously. It does not bode well for the civilized world that the purveyors of barbarism are freely trampling over the term "truth." These individuals should NOT be allowed to get away with their spurious and disgraceful assertions but should be loudly called to the carpet.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, March 22, 2007 - 4:47 PMummm... that article on the bangladesh liberation war is totally inaccurate. then east pakistan became a part of pakistan after the partition of india BECAUSE it was a muslim majority. that's what the partition was, a division of british india along lines of local religious majority. i don't know what the percentage was then but modern day bangladesh is 83% muslim. and the civil war between east and west pakistan was a war between muslims. that figure of 3,000,000 civilian deaths is not regarded as definitive by most scholars of south asia, it comes from a remark made by the first prime minister of bangladesh (a muslim) immediately after the war. most scholarly estimates put it at closer to 300,000 people, huge numbers of whom were muslim. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, March 22, 2007 - 8:23 PMNaa, I think she made note of that:
The National Geographic article of November 1972 calls what happened to the Bengalis a "Holocaust," addressing the mind-numbing mayhem and horror that decimated villages and left mass graves for all to see. At this time, art became filled with bloody images of murder and rape; even children were encouraged in drawing contests to chronicle these horrors. This section in the Geographic states:
"Sheik Mujib's government says that three million Bengalis died between March and December 1971. The figure is probably inflated. But certainly the terrors and atrocities committed here - in Dacca [Dhaka] and all across the gentle land of rivers and marshlands - came close to genocide."
Other than that, you want to take it up with 'The National Geographic' since they wrote that article.
I don't think this changes the point of "The Truth About Islam" though.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 8:17 AMThe problem is with fundamentalist Islam. There are very many people that practice Islam, especially in more secular nations who believe in the separation of mosque and state.
It is not dissimilar to the divergence between fundamentalist Christians and Christians who accept separation of church and state.
If I remember correctly, Bush is a Christian and has the blood of over 500,000 Iraqis on his hands.
I do not consider all Ismamic people to be my enemy andy more than I view all Christians that way.
Some of this anti Muslim propganda is put out by right wing Christians like Wiliiam Bennett
(author of The Boookies of Virtue) in order to justify US foreign policy.
I consider my self an agnostic and a free thinker and I still defend the rights of citizens to practice the religion of their choice. In the U.S. the rights of Muslims, Christians and Jews are give equal protection of the Constitution.
If we wish to talk about violent religions then we cannot forget things like the Crusades and the Inquisition. For sheer brutality and bloodshed the Islamic faith is no different than the Christian faith.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 8:46 AMMaybe this should be a different thread, but related to this is the idea that secular society has had a civilizing effect on religion. That because in large parts of the world religion has existed in secular societies. Sadly it has not civilized fundamentalism, but with more time....?
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 11:21 AMI go along with what Chopper is saying. Any Islamist that is really peaceful, then he rejects the violent aspect of Islam and says publically that those who do great violence are not really Islamists. Instead of that we get silent groveling, face in the dust, or worse, cooperation in the violence. Sorry, not convinced.
"If we wish to talk about violent religions then we cannot forget things like the Crusades and the Inquisition. For sheer brutality and bloodshed the Islamic faith is no different than the Christian faith. " -This is a defense of Islam? -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 11:39 AMI am not defending Islam any more than Christianity. They have both caused great harm in the world. I do defend the Constitutional rights of of Muslims as well as Christians. As long as they respect the rights of others, something that only a secular society can guarantee IMHO.
How does this sound? : "Any Christian that is really peaceful, then he rejects the violent aspect of Christianity and says publicly that those who do great violence are not really Christians.....
I think our civil liberities are better off if we just assume that the rights of all believers and non believers are equally protected by the U.S. Constitution.
I refuse to be turned against my neighbors just because of their religious belief. Isn't that part of what we all reject in places like Iran or Saudi Arabia? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 11:55 AM"How does this sound? : 'Any Christian that is really peaceful, then he rejects the violent aspect of Christianity and says publicly that those who do great violence are not really Christians.....' "
That's great! But are Christians going to reject those parts of their holy book that preach violence any more than Muslims? I doubt it.
I do not defend any rights, constitutional or otherwise, of any group who swears obedience to a particular big daddy in the sky, who commands them to kill, carry out agressive war, mistreat women, etc. Why should I? They already have me under a death sentence and it is only secular justice that keeps them from carrying it out. Respect them? How silly! Kill them? No, I will not sink to their level. Unless, of course, they come for me first. Like Hitler's Christian based SS coming to get Jews to kill them.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 11:41 AMwhat does that even mean? how can anyone say someone else isn't an "islamist". someone is muslim because they say they're muslim. a muslim saying that islam is a religion of peace is doing what he can and should do, trying to direct people toward what is good and peaceful about their religion. internally and externally.
and how is speaking out about how they experience the nature of their religion silent groveling?
what on earth are they supposed to do about what drives someone to commit suicide to bomb something? the fact that they might talk with more sympathy about what would drive someone to do something like that in a way that isn't a hysterically xenophobic reaction to islam doesn't mean that they have thier "face in the dust".
"I go along with what Chopper is saying. Any Islamist that is really peaceful, then he rejects the violent aspect of Islam and says publically that those who do great violence are not really Islamists. Instead of that we get silent groveling, face in the dust, or worse, cooperation in the violence. Sorry, not convinced. "
-
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 9:11 AMIf anyone still believes that Islam is so 'peaceful', then explain the article below. And explain why this woman & so many others are fearing for their lives? Explain why Muslims were so willing to KILL over a few Mohammad cartoons? Why are they so willing to blow themselves up? Why are women afraid to show their hair or even skin from their ankles? Also, why is Van Gogh DEAD?
Ayaan Hirsi Ali infuriates Muslims and discomfits liberals
www.israpundit.com/2006/
Instead of Muslisms attacking folks for exposing these points, maybe their time would better spent cleaning up their own backyard by going after all of these perpetrators of violence in the name of Islam? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 11:35 AMperhaps moderate muslims would be in a better position to moderate islam if the west didn't participate in such hysterical attacks on islam in general and make hysterical claims about what islam "is".
islam is no better or worse than any other religion. call out the specific ideas, don't try to vilify a religion in general, and particularly don't attack the very attempts at moderation that you are supposedly trying to demand.
when a muslim public figure says that "islam is a religion of peace" he is just as much talking to other muslims as he is you.
"Instead of Muslisms attacking folks for exposing these points, maybe their time would better spent cleaning up their own backyard by going after all of these perpetrators of violence in the name of Islam? "
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, March 23, 2007 - 11:31 AMthe national geographic article states that it is "probably inflated", the article you posted a link to presents it as fact. and your post presents it as fact.
"The National Geographic article of November 1972 calls what happened to the Bengalis a "Holocaust," addressing the mind-numbing mayhem and horror that decimated villages and left mass graves for all to see. At this time, art became filled with bloody images of murder and rape; even children were encouraged in drawing contests to chronicle these horrors. This section in the Geographic states:
"Sheik Mujib's government says that three million Bengalis died between March and December 1971. The figure is probably inflated. But certainly the terrors and atrocities committed here - in Dacca [Dhaka] and all across the gentle land of rivers and marshlands - came close to genocide."
Other than that, you want to take it up with 'The National Geographic' since they wrote that article.
I don't think this changes the point of "The Truth About Islam" though. " -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 10:04 AMPedophilia in Islam
Muhammed -The Pedophile -
Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64: Sahih Bukhari Aisha: that the Prophet (Muhammed 53 years old) married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
www.papillonsartpalace.com/muht...d.htm
-------
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:
"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."
Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
“It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”
www.faithfreedom.org/Article...18p2.htm -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 10:19 AMIf he was a pedophile perhaps he would have been happier as a Catholic priest. : )
-
-
Unsu...
A scary quote from The Bible....
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 11:40 AM"How blessed the one who seizes your little children and smashes them against a rock"
Psalms 137:9
Where I live about 95% of the people consider themselves to be good Christians. For the sake of all of the children around here I pray they are not that devout.
Horrible ideas can be found in many religious writings. It makes no sense to single out either one because of a particular quote in a sacred text. In reality I think most believers of the Bible reject the above quote. I am sure that most Muslims do not condone pedophilia because of what Mohammad reportedly said.
-
-
The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 12:51 PMAgain, another straw man argument. I feel the same about the bible, Christianity & more. Catholic Preists doing the same make it okay? No, of course not. Every single time someone has responded to this article defending Islam, they've given the same straw man arguemnt - saying, 'well Christianity does it too". What's up with that? It would behoove you to actually condemn this evil practice, rather than setting up straw men and attempting to wave it away. I am wondering to myself, what kind of people would not immediately condemn this type of practice?
The most ardent Muslim clerics constantly take quotes out of context in order to justify their sadistic behavior calling for the death of infidels & mistreatment of women.
This thread is titled, "The Truth About Islam" I have many threads exposing Christianity as well as many other religions for what they really are. Attempts to change the subject only demonstrates the lack of argument supporting the "peacefulness" of Islam. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 1:51 PMI have never argued that Islam was a peaceful religion. I oppose the campaign of vilification of an entire population of citizens because of their religious affiliation.
When I read some of the anti-Islam propaganda from people like Franklin Graham it reminds me of the anti-Japanese propaganda in the 40's that led to the internment of thousands of US citizens. Some of it even recalls the anti Semitic slanders that were used against the Jewish People during WWII.
The constitutional protection for freedom of religion applies to those who believe in the Bible and the Koran. And as a secularist I believe the Constitution gives me the right to be free from religion.
There are many fundamentalists in the U.S. who whip up a campaign of vilification against secular humanists, a campaign very much like that being directed against our fellow citizens who happen to believe in Islam.
So who is next? which group will be the next target of such a campaign? Another religion?
An ethnic group? Gays? Immigrants?
The time to prevent the persecution of an entire people is now.
"Those who would give up liberty for security deserve neither"
Benjamin Franklin
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 4:05 PMIslam is a violent religion. And of course I do not blame most the muslims. They were brought up to belive that nonsense so they do. Of course, there is back up to keep them there. This "peaceful" religion has one penalty for converting from Islam to another religion or no religion, and that is death. Of course, this penalty is peacefully applied, perhaps by a simple community stoning- nothing really violent.
The only reason that Chrisianity is not killing non-belivers today, is not due to any change in the religion. It's because secular government wrested control from the church, bringing it under the control of civil law, not the other way around. But I firmly feel that Christianity is, at the core, as bloody and violent as it was in the past. If some of the far right fundies were able to wield absolute control legally again, you don't believe that burnings at the stake would not appear again? Sure they would. Right out in front of the White House. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, March 24, 2007 - 7:04 PMVery good points by Bear & Roy.
"I have never argued that Islam was a peaceful religion. I oppose the campaign of vilification of an entire population of citizens because of their religious affiliation."
Okay Bear, I'm with you now. I have heard so many defenders of Islam lately saying, "Well look at what Christianity has done, if they can do it, so can we". I jumped the gate.
I'm saying, mass violence is wrong no matter who or what it is. Of course, I concur with your statement regarding not vilifying entire cultures. No one has made any generalities about people under the spell of Islam. However, an ideology that brainwashes people to do harmful acts to others is certainly condemnable, and it's the ideology that needs exposure here.
Most folks are not ware of the serious abuse of women in Islam & especially, the Pedophilia in Islam or that Muhammed himself was a Pedophile.
"Faith Freedom International is a grassroots movement of ex-Muslims. Its goals are to (a) unmask Islam and show that it is an imperialistic ideology akin to Nazism but disguised as religion and (b) to help Muslims leave it, end this culture of hate caused by their "us" vs. "them" ethos and embrace the human race in amity. We strive for the unity of Mankind through the elimination of Islam, the most insidious doctrine of hate. Islam can't be reformed, but it can be eradicated. It can't be molded, but it can be smashed. It is rigid but brittle. That is why Muslims do not tolerate criticism of it."
www.faithfreedom.org -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, March 29, 2007 - 10:03 PMSharia Law in Germany -- Well On The Way!
An excellent 8-part article in Der Spiegel. Seems at least some
Germans are waking up to the dangers of multi-cultural tolerance,
towards those who are fully intolerant, and plan to eventually "take
over". Americans, Brits, Europeans, Canadians... especially women!
Read and learn. This is happening in your territory as well. J.D.
*Part 1: Paving the Way for a Muslim Parallel Society
www.spiegel.de/internatio...629,00.html
A recent ruling in Germany by a judge who cited the Koran underscores
the dilemma the country faces in reconciling Western values with a
growing immigrant population. A disturbing number of rulings are
helping to create a parallel Muslim world in Germany that is
welcoming to Islamic fundamentalists. ...
*Part 2: Does Germany already Have Sharia Law?
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-2,00.html
Ursula Spuler-Stegemann, an Islam expert from the central German
university town of Marburg, has a similar take on the matter. "Do we
already have Sharia here?" she asks, adding that the Frankfurt case
shows that "things are getting out of hand here." ...
*Part 3: Violating the Principles of Equal Treatment
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-3,00.html
For far too long, Germany's muslim immigrants were not asked to put
much effort into integrating. For decades, German judges essentially
paved the way for Islamic fundamentalists to form a parallel society.
They raised little opposition to the strategy employed by Islamic
groups to demand their supposed religious freedom in court until they
got it. But the judges must have known, argues Johannes Kandel, that
"giving preferential treatment to groups violates the principle of
equal treatment in a secular legal system. ...
*Part 4: Giving the Muezzin Free Reign
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-4,00.html
Muslims can also often count on the support of German courts when it
comes to building mosques. As far back as 1992, the Federal
Administrative Court ruled that neighbors must "fundamentally accept"
being woken before sunup. ...
*Part 5: The Camel Fatwa and other Letters from Absurdistan
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-5,00.html
This was an attitude that still prevailed in the minds of German
judges one year after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks. At the time,
the higher administrative court in the state of North
Rhine-Westphalia ruled that a female Muslim student in the 10th grade
should be permitted not to take part in a school trip. The family had
argued that Islam prohibits allowing girls to go on such trips
without being accompanied by a male family member. The family also
insisted that the girl was constantly worried about losing her
headscarf. The judges found that such fears were "comparable with the
situation of a partially mentally impaired person who, because of her
disability, can only travel with a companion." This assessment was
devastating because it accepted the rules of a camel drivers' society
in the modern age -- literally, because a few years earlier, an
Islamic legal opinion dubbed the "camel fatwa" had been added to the
professional literature. ...
*Part 6: "Integration Has Failed Here"
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-6,00.html
Experiences in urban German schools show just how much integration
has suffered as a result of the decisions of timorous judges in past
years. At the Carlo Mierendorff School in Preungesheim, a Frankfurt
neighborhood, about one-third of students in the upper grades are
permitted to not attend class trips for religious reasons, says
Alexander Zabler, the school's principal. To prevent their daughters
from traveling with schoolmates, many Muslim parents have either
called the girls in sick or simply ordered them not to show up.
Zabler tried many approaches, including talking to the parents,
visiting them at home, offering special meals for Muslims during
travel -- but all to no avail. Finally he turned to the government
and asked the local school board for help -- also to no avail. He has
since resigned. ...
*Part 7: Forced Marriages and Servility
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-7,00.html
Of course, in many families there is no escaping the closeness
justified by Muslim traditions and rules. Women are brought up to
serve and obey. Boys are alternately spoiled and beaten, as custom
requires. According to a study conducted by the Lower Saxony
Criminology Research Institute, physical abuse of boys is more than
twice as common in Turkish families than German families. And "girls
from conservative families say that their fathers and brothers have
the right to hit them," reports Judith Gerling-Tamer, an educator at
the Elisi Evi Support Center for women and girls in Berlin's heavily
Muslim Kreuzberg district. ...
*Part 8: Europe at a Crossroads
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-8,00.html
Berlin attorney Seyran Ates says: "We are at a crossroads, everywhere
in Europe. Do we allow structures that lead straight into a parallel
society, or do we demand assimilation into the democratic
constitutional state?" ... -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 7:27 AMYou ought to go post that on the True Islam tribe. LOL. Have your fire extinguisher at hand. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 8:05 AMWhy isn't this thread just called "the truth about fundamentalists"? Fundamentalists of all stripes are xenophobic and oppressive - be they christian or muslim. Why not speak about against fundamentalism and religious extremism of all kinds? Or against christian influence on secular life and law?
Of course Sharia law shouldn't take the place of national law, just as christian fundamentalists' religious laws shouldn't take the place of national law (or be the basis of national laws and personal rights). Bigotry results when you hold up one group as an example while ignoring or accepting the same behavior from people in or associated with your own identity. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 8:35 AM"Why isn't this thread just called "the truth about fundamentalists"? Fundamentalists of all stripes are xenophobic and oppressive - be they christian or muslim. Why not speak about against fundamentalism and religious extremism of all kinds? Or against christian influence on secular life and law?
Of course Sharia law shouldn't take the place of national law, just as christian fundamentalists' religious laws shouldn't take the place of national law (or be the basis of national laws and personal rights). Bigotry results when you hold up one group as an example while ignoring or accepting the same behavior from people in or associated with your own identity."
Amen (irony intended.) A plague on all their houses, to borrow an Abrahamic epiteth. (And of course it's in the nature of fundamentalists to take a statement like that literally rather than as metaphor.)
But it is fair to distinguish the differences in degree to which each form of fundamentalism seeks to impose its worldview, its meta-narrative, onto society as a whole.
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 8:52 AM"Holy War: a bloody battle to determine who has the best imaginary friend"
Christianity and Islam both have a bloody history of trying to force their particular book on other people. Powerful people who support the current US occupation of Iraq are encouraging anti-Islam bias as part of their war propaganda. As a humanist I oppose both the war and anti-Islamic bigotry.
The current campaign to vilify Muslims is very similar to the sort of propaganda that has been used in pogroms against groups of people in the past.
The overwhelming majority of Muslims in western countries including the U.S. reject fundamentalist Islam as much as most Christians reject Christian based fundamentalism.
I think humanists have everything to gain by defending the dignity and rights of all citizens. If the rights of one group is undermined then we all lose. An injury to one is an injury to all.
-
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 9:28 AMIndeed. Every war has been accompanied by some degree of demonization of the Other. WW I: the ruthless Huns (Germans), WW II: Yellow Peril (Japanese) etc.
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 9:37 AMI still think religion of any kind should not be allowed. It should be illegal to practice any religion. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 9:48 AMPolitical movements and cults that advocate the overthrow or taking over of the government and supression the constitution can be banned, outlawed and shut down, and the same should be true of churches that advocate the same thing. Fundlementalists whatever the flavor all sound basically the same. They are all very dangerous. I think they need to be harshly put down. Eveyone's freedom is at risk. -
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 10:21 AMJim, the Bill of Rights applies equally to religious and political viewpoints. If we allow the government to ban any philosophy no matter how obnoxious the ideas may be then all of our rights are in danger. In the dark days of McCarthyism people use to fear speaking against the government for fear of being labeled "subversive".
I agree that religion is very harmful to the human spirit, but suppressing it is not the answer IMHO.
There is some reason for optimism to found in recent polls that show that more younger people consider themselves agnostics or atheists than at any other time in history. Some of the reasons sighted for this happy development include the fact that the actions of fundamentalists of all stripes have turned a whole generation of folks away from religion. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 10:49 AM"There is some reason for optimism to found in recent polls that show that more younger people consider themselves agnostics or atheists than at any other time in history. Some of the reasons sighted for this happy development include the fact that the actions of fundamentalists of all stripes have turned a whole generation of folks away from religion."
Yes; letting their obnoxious ignorance be exposed to the withering light of day is preferable to driving it underground, where, ironically, it might gain more cachet. The idea that their actions being on view have helped turn off a lot off younger folks matches my observations. (BTW, it's "cited" - like "citation" - not "sighted", though you could say you sighted something that was cited. ;-) I come from a line of journalists.)
I won't be so naive as to say that it's just a matter of the best ideas (rational, humanist, pluralist) winning out in the "marketplace of ideas", in some vague Kantian sense, since we know all too well how all markets, literal and metaphoric, can be coerced or manipulated, but still, I think it's preferable to protect all viewpoints under the banner of free speech. And hate speech (not always easy to define) can be punished or held accountable without banning it outright. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 11, 2007 - 11:03 AMYou all are probably correct, and I guess my post was not all together serious.
I have been reading a lot on tribe and other places about things related to fundamentalists that it seems like they are everywhere.
Each groups thinks its fairy tales are better then the other guy's.
Sometime it seems like no one wants to think for themselves.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 4:01 AMWhile free speech and tolerance for all is a thing that sounds good and sounds like something that would be desirable in a society, I find it hard to figure out how it be attained .Religions are based on total intolerance of other religion. Each one thinks it has found the key to salvation and that all the others haven't. They see each other a threats that need to be convinced to change or be done eliminated. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 4:40 AMThat is why separation of church and state is the best way to protect everybody's freedom.
The fact that under the US Constitution no single religion is allowed to impose their will on others is what keeps them all in check. Here in the US we have sort of a Christian Taliban who would if given the chance make Christianity the state religion of America. Thankfully both the public and the Constitution places a wall of separation between church and state.
Some religious advocates believe that religion can help civilize society. I believe the opposite is true. I think that since in the west religion has existed in a secular context that secular society has had a civilizing influence on religion. Secular society forces all religions to co-exist along side each other and does not allow any religion to make rules for the rest of us.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 5:25 AMNo offense Bear but as your neighbor I'd like to point out that the wall separating church and state in the US is pretty flimsy and damaged. A born again president who thinks (or at least says) he's doing god's will and starts a "crusade" against "evil" and then allocates most of the country's resources to fighting an aggressive offensive war to protect "our way of life" and "our values"... A president who doesn't allow funding of sex education or women's health care services if they're provided by an organization that also allows women to choose to practice birth control or terminate a pregnancy. This president has had enough support from other elected officials to be able to enact all these faith based initiatives so there's obviously a very very large bridge over, or tunnel under, that wall that's supposed to separate church and state.
I'm not sure about secular society having a "civilizing influence" upon religion. That's an interesting idea but I'm not sure it's actually true. Religions have coexisted at many times and places in history - particularly in cities that were centres for trade or ports. Cosmopolitan societies tend to be more tolerant - and our world seems to have become split between the cosmopolitan and the xenophobic fundamentalists (with a large number of the herd pulled between their two urges).
And let's not forget that the "secular" society in the West has a christian basis and bias, and many of our laws are based in christian morality. Some of this has changed over the past couple of decades but, for instance, something that's as obviously an equal right as gay marriage is, is being opposed on moral grounds. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 8:24 AMA human being is part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. We experience ourselves, our thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest. A kind of optical delusion of consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from the prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. The true value of a human being is determined by the measure and the sense in which they have obtained liberation from the self. We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if humanity is to survive. (Albert Einstein, 1954)
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 9:03 AMFifi, you are right that the wall separating church and state has been made too porous by the government. The good news is that most citizens believe that the wall between church and state should stand. It is a constant battle to defend constitutional rights.
One of the issues you mentioned, xenophobia has become a big issue here. After years of being scapegoated for economic problems immigrants are standing up for their rights. Last year the largest political demonstrations in U.S. history took place when millions joined rallies on May 1st for full rights for all immigrants. (and it has reestablished international workers day in the U.S.)
I think the issue of marriage rights is important and worth fighting for, but as a secular humanist I think civil unions are the only thing that the government should be recognizing for both heterosexual and same sex unions. When the issue is posed as "gay marriage" it implies that the government could force religions to recognize all marriages, but if all couples can obtain a civil union license it would be up to individual churches, temples, and mosques to label the union as a marriage or not according to their belief system.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 10:04 AMBear - I find it odd that the fact that the battle for gay marriage is perceived by so many Americans as being about the right to marry in a church not as about equal civil recognition of same sex partnerships. I know that in Canada it's certainly been about equal civil rights as derived from marriage (right to make life and death choices for your partner, inheritance, parental rights, pensions, etc). In secular society a civil union between a man and a woman is still called marriage. This strange distinction seems to be more of an attempt to appease fundamentalists than anything else to me (and an attempt by churches to claim the area of family as their exclusive domain). My friends who got married outside of the church are still "married", they're not civil-unionized! ;) I find these huge distinctions made between civil and religious rituals a bit odd too (after all, they're both essentially rituals to celebrate or personalize a legal commitment to each other and not the legal commitment itself which is the marriage license and other paperwork). Despite the hysteria of fundamentalist religious leaders of all stripes (isn't it nice they can put down their differences to get a collective hate on), gays won't be knocking down the doors of their temples to join them or marry their sons and daughters. There are enough moderate churches that accept gay people in their congregation that can fill that role for gay people who are religious.
I think it should also be noted that the US has a long history of xenophobia (not singling your country out here, most do) and that it's not a recent development (and that tolerance is more the exception than the rule). There's the most obvious example - slavery and the ongoing xenophobia against Americans of African descent ever since. Also each wave of immigrants has faced the "they'll take our jobs, wives and manhood" xenophobia - the Irish, the Italians, and so on - before they've been accepted (usually when a new "other" arrives).
Can you serve up some recent evidence that the majority of Americans want a separate of church and state? -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 10:32 AMOn specific issues a majority of Americans are at odds with the fundamentalist agenda.
Most polls continue to show strong support for a woman's right to an abortion and support upholding Roe v. Wade. In last year's elections residents of two states voted to uphold the rights of women under 18 to get an abortion without parental consent.
In both polls and at least one state measure majorities voted in favor of stem cell research. On another issue, that being patient self-determination when dying most Americans support a person's right to die with dignity. Polls taken in 2005 showed that most U.S. citizens were offended at the government's attempt to interfere in the private affairs of the Schiavo Family.
There is mixed news about how people view LGBT rights. Out of eight states who voted last year only one (Arizona) upheld gay marriage rights. Another issue that Canada and other countries are way ahead of the U.S. The exit polls taken in those states showed strong support for civil unions and other civil rights for gays and lesbians.
The picture is not rosy, but I think there are grounds for some optimism.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 10:54 AMBear - I mean no offense to you personally. And I've got plenty of American friends I love and obviously it's a big country with a wide diversity of people and cultures. It seems that the only place difference melts into one pot in the US is in the realm of the imaginary (or on TV where everyone is whitewashed...including white people ;). Segregation is still rife (if not specifically legally required). Most Americans are suspicious of anyone who isn't American (once again afraid we'll steal your jobs, girls and stuff, even though those of us who live in countries with medicare and somewhat egalitarian social contracts don't quite understand why you'd think we'd want them ;) and pretty nationalistic. I'd suspect a majority of Americans think America "invented" democracy. I think it was Einstein who compared nationalism to being a juvenile disease like the measles (and plenty of populations are infected, I'm not singling out the US here).
I've seen polls that support both polarities in debates about personal rights vs religious obligations so I don't take polls to be that much of an indicator of anything other than the pollster's position. The US is certainly not the leader in human rights it likes to consider itself and it's the actions not the polls that indicate this - the highest percentage of the population in jail of any westernized nation, Roe vs Wade even being an issue, lack of a social safety net and sharing of wealth, international war crimes, etc. All that said, we've all still got a long way to go and it's a shame that so many hard won rights are still so fragile and easily broken. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 11:03 AMI take no offense at criticism of the U.S. I consider myself a planetary citizen above all else. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 11:23 AMI guess the reality of life in the US is not in line with the perception of it. But hasn't it been this way for a long time?
I graduated from high school in 1961 and have found out that almost everything I was taught as far as history, and social science was pure crap. In many cases it was no basis in reality at all.
-
-
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 3:12 PMi don't think it's an attempt to appease fundamentalists i think it's a cynical and calculated effort by politically savvy fundamentalists to reframe the debate in a way that will inflame a sufficient number of ordinary people. and they've done it very successfully, it's so difficult to change the terms of a debate once talking points have been established now that the marketplace of ideas (mal)functions through newstainment.
"This strange distinction seems to be more of an attempt to appease fundamentalists than anything else to me (and an attempt by churches to claim the area of family as their exclusive domain)." -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 3:46 PMmatthew - you're right about it being a cynical reframing of the issue (well, actually falsifying what the actual issue is). And they've been very successful clearly, since obviously there are Americans who aren't religious who seem to think that the issue revolves around unreasonable gay couples who are demanding to be married in homophobic churches rather than the right for same sex couples' who commit to each other as life partners to have the same rights as heterosexual couples. It's pretty clear that there's appeasement of fundamentalists going on when their "right" as an institution not to marry people is somehow given the same status as individual rights to equal treatment. It's pretty clear when you look at this issue that fundamentalist sects of various religions aren't at war with each other - they share a world view, if not the same god/s, and work together towards a common goal.
Which brings us back to the original topic of this post and the truth...which is that fundamentalists of all religions are equally oppressive to women, gay people and even men (though men have the chance of rising to the role of oppressor). That child molesters often take refuge in religion and use it to justify their actions (it's a position of trust that allows them access to children, and they may initially have hoped that god would "cure" them of their sinful lusts, etc). The best inoculation against fascism is freedom...and I mean a taste of real freedom not the choice between 20 brands of the same sugary cereal, or being able to choose between coke and pepsi. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 4:59 PMabsolutely, and the fact that rabid christianity isn't out there executing gay teenagers on their doorsteps (as iraqi deathsquads are doing) is because of the efforts of humanists to limit and control such rabidity in this country not their gentler nature. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 12, 2007 - 5:06 PMmatthew - rabid people, both religious and secular, are dangerous (as well as frothy at the mouth;). There are homophobic atheists as well, they just justify it differently. There are also accepting and humane people who believe in god and are religious. I'm not sure rabid anti-religiousity isn't as dangerous and ultimately dehumanizing to all concerned as all other forms of obsessive hate. I do understand that you come by these sentiments honestly and personally, and I have compassion for your history. You just seem to be in reaction to your past (and with that I'll cease and desist before I start into territory which is none of my business :). -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, April 13, 2007 - 9:37 AMprobably. = )
the anti-religiousness of fundamentalist communism was definately horrible for instance. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, April 13, 2007 - 10:00 AMIt's the totalising, grandiose attitude that's found especially in fundamentalist religions but also in "secular" movements like Nazi-ism ( is that a word?), fascism, most forms of Marxist-Leninism, Maoism, and even the worship of free-market capitalism, etc. that is the thing to be on guard against:
"We've got a Theory that explains everything, for everybody, everywhere. History is on our side, and if you don't agree, we'll have to persecute you or even kill you. (Or at least treat you with contempt as irrelevant and in the way.) We're just fulilling the Will of History." (Or some variation of that horseshit.)
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, April 13, 2007 - 10:22 AMNot supprisingly it is fundamentalists of the Christian brand who are calling for a 'holy war' against Islam. People like Rev, Franklin Graham and William Bennett are leading a charge to demonize all people who practice Islam. Both sides in that war would likely have secular humanists executed. It seems that fundies of all stripes have hateful attitudes towards females and queer folks. IMHO the way to oppose such hate is thru organizing opposition to their ideas. It would be a big mistake to ask the government to ban any aprticular religion or idea. Any such power given to the government will come back to bite us in the butt. The government would use such power to go after anybody and all of our civil liberities would be in danger.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, April 13, 2007 - 10:25 AMWhat was left of our civil liberites has been attack since GW came to power. But I'm drifting off topic.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, April 13, 2007 - 12:02 PMyup. taoism is a lovely religion in that sense. "the way that can be named is not the way" "the man who says that he knows does not know".
"It's the totalising, grandiose attitude that's found especially in fundamentalist religions but also in "secular" movements like Nazi-ism ( is that a word?), fascism, most forms of Marxist-Leninism, Maoism, and even the worship of free-market capitalism, etc. that is the thing to be on guard against:
"We've got a Theory that explains everything, for everybody, everywhere. History is on our side, and if you don't agree, we'll have to persecute you or even kill you. (Or at least treat you with contempt as irrelevant and in the way.) We're just fulilling the Will of History." (Or some variation of that horseshit.) " -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, April 14, 2007 - 10:30 PMRadicals vs. moderates: British Muslims at crossroads
DUBLIN, Ireland (CNN) -- At a recent debate over the battle for Islamic ideals in England, a British-born Muslim stood before the crowd and said Prophet Mohammed's message to nonbelievers is: "I come to slaughter all of you."
"We are the Muslims," said Omar Brooks, an extremist also known as Abu Izzadeen. "We drink the blood of the enemy, and we can face them anywhere. That is Islam and that is jihad."
Anjem Choudary, the public face of Islamist extremism in Britain, added that Muslims have no choice but to take the fight to the West.
"What are Muslims supposed to do when they are being killed in the streets in Afghanistan and Baghdad and Palestine? Do they not have the same rights to defend themselves? In war, people die. People don't make love; they kill each other," he said. (Audio slide show: Preying on Britain's young Muslims)
But in the same debate, held on the prestigious grounds of Dublin's Trinity College in October, many people in the crowd objected.
"These people, ladies and gentleman, have a good look at them. They actually believe if you kill women and children, you will go to heaven," said one young Muslim who waved his finger at the radicals.
"This is not ideology. It's a mental illness." (Watch 'No chance in hell' Video)
'Foreign policy has a lot to do with it'
This war of words is part of a larger debate going on in Britain -- the war within the Muslim community for the hearts and minds of young people. The battle of ideas came to the fore again this week when the trial began for six men who are accused of an "extremist Muslim plot" to target London on July 21, 2005.
The Woolwich Crown Court was told the men plotted to carry out a series of "murderous suicide bombings" on London's public transport system, just 14 days after the carnage of the July 7 London bombings, which killed 52 commuters and four bombers.
While Islamic extremists are believed to be a tiny minority of Britain's 1.6 million Muslims, they have no problem having their criticism heard. They have disdain for democracy -- and, most of all, the Bush administration's war on terror policies.
A poll taken in June 2006 for the Times of London newspaper suggested that 13 percent of British Muslims believe the July 7 London bombers were martyrs.
"Foreign policy has a lot to do with it," said Hanif Qadir, a youth worker and a moderate voice for Islam in Walthamstow, one of London's biggest Muslim neighborhoods. "But it's the minority radical groups that use that to get to our young people."
In August, British police descended on Walthamstow, saying they had foiled a conspiracy to blow up a dozen U.S.-bound airliners with liquid explosives. That set off the biggest security alert since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Police arrested 24 people in connection with the alleged terror plot, although one man was released after it was determined he was an innocent bystander.
Britain's Scotland Yard and MI5 have also said they are aware of at least 30 terrorist cells and potential plots inside Britain.
'Blowing people up is quite cool'
Young Muslims are easy prey, Qadir told CNN, because they believe the British government crackdown has scapegoated them because of their religious beliefs. The youth also can empathize with those who castigate the Bush administration.
There are some who believe "blowing people up is quite cool," Qadir said.
Qadir asked them why that was justified.
"The answers that I got back is: When a bomb goes off in Baghdad or in Afghanistan and innocent women and children are killed over there, who cares for them? So if a bomb goes off in America or in London, what's wrong with that?" he said.
Qadir is trying to get mosque leaders, many still practicing the tribal traditions of Pakistan, to communicate with the younger generation. But he says it is an uphill battle when radicals like Choudary dominate the debate, getting their faces -- and their message -- out in the public.
"Our scholars ... are not coming out of their holes -- their mosques and their holes -- to engage with these people. They're frightened of that," Qadir said.
The message of extremism can also thrive among youth who see no way out of ethnic ghettos.
"They're into all kinds of vices -- street crime, gun crime, drugs, car theft, credit card fraud. But then now you've got another threat," Qadir said.
"The new threat is radicalism. It's a cause. Every young man wants a cause."
Activist calls for Islamic law
Choudary, whose group Al-Mahajiroun disbanded before the British government could outlaw it under its anti-terror laws, spoke to CNN and made clear he wants to see Islamic law for Britain.
"All of the world belongs to Allah, and we will live according to the Sharia wherever we are," said Choudary, a lawyer. "This is a fundamental belief of the Muslims." (Watch a call for Islamic law Video)
Asked if he believes in democracy, he said, "No, I don't at all."
"One day, the Sharia will be implemented in Britain. It's a matter of time."
Choudary cited the videotaped "will" of one of the London subway bombers, Mohammed Sidique Khan, who said, "Until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people, we will not stop this fight."
Choudary said he sides strongly with that statement -- "we have everything we need in those wills" -- and he cited passages from the Muslim holy book, the Quran, that he says justify jihad.
"I happen to be in an ideological and political war," Choudary said. "My brothers in al Qaeda and other Mujahedeen are involved in a military campaign."
While Choudary and other radicals continue to try to spread their beliefs, others say there is no justification for jihad in England. Imam Usama Hasan memorized the Quran by the time he was 11 and at 19, he briefly fought in Afghanistan against the Soviets.
"If you have the wrong intention, you can justify your criminal actions from any text -- whether it's the Quran or Bible or Shakespeare," Hasan said.
He said it makes him "furious" when radicals quote the Quran out of context to justify killing of innocents. It's a "very tiny" minority with such beliefs, he said, but "it only takes a handful, of course, to create devastation."
"Many people are terrified of Muslims. They are terrified of a brother walking down the road with his eastern dress and his hat and his beard, because they have seen these images associated with suicide bombers," he said.
"It is up to us to dispel that fear -- to smile at people to tell them that ... the message of Islam is not about bits of cloth. It is not about the beard or head scarf or the face veil or violence. It is about peace."
www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/e...ew/index.html -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, April 15, 2007 - 12:22 PMIslamic pro-terrorism hate film gets PG rating
* Death Series movies urge children to martyr themselves
* Censor board awarded series PG rating
* Film vilifies Jewish as 'army of pigs'
A PRO-TERROR hate film that urges children to martyr themselves in Islam's war on the West and calls Jews "pigs" has been rated PG by Australia's censors.
Sheik Feiz Mohammed's DVD box set, which also calls for the murder of non-believers, was initially seized by Federal anti-terror police.
But the Office of Film and Literature Classification has ruled that The Death Series is suitable to be bought and watched by children.
The shock decision has seen the nation's peak censorship body slammed as weak and out of touch by family groups and the Jewish community.
It has also made a mockery of the Attorney-General's plans to bring in tough new laws that ban material which "advocates" terrorism.
The PG decision comes as Australian-born Sheik Feiz, who is in exile in Lebanon, is still preaching to Australians by phone.
The films urge parents to make their children holy warriors and martyrs, and praises jihad as the pinnacle of Islam.
The radical sheik makes snorting noises on the films as he vilifies Jews as the "army of pigs".
He blames a lack of courage for martyrdom on the battlefield for the "humiliation" of Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and Guantanamo.
The censors' finding means children of any age can watch the films - but it is advised under-15s have a parent present.
The OFLC finding said the sheik's calls to "jihad" and "martyrdom" were ambiguous.
And it found that comments vilifying Jews as an "army of pigs" and saying "behind me is a Jew, come kill him" were mitigated by the context.
The Australian/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council said the PG rating proved the current censorship guidelines had dangerous shortcomings.
"In the Feiz Mohammed case, as well as others, there seems to be inadequate consideration to the dangers posed by the non-fiction advocacy of violence and bigotry, as opposed to its graphic depiction," AIJAC head Dr Colin Rubenstein said.
He said he hoped that a review of the laws would deal with the serious problem of incitement.
The Australian Family Association said the Sheik Feiz decision was just the latest ruling by a "hardened" OFLC detached from community values.
www.news.com.au/story/0,23...421,00.html -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Mon, April 16, 2007 - 9:24 AMI thought this was worth posting to this discussion since it shows a different perspective on what's going on in Australia. Multiculturalism seems much more aligned with humanist values to me than fear and hate based ideas and attitudes aimed at "protecting our values". Has anyone else noticed how similar the fear based discourse are that come from both the religious fundamentalists and "patriots" who wish to "protect Australian values" or "protect American values" or "protect French values"? (While conveniently forgetting that their forefathers immigrated to Australia and America and imported and imposed their values themselves.)
www.smh.com.au/news/opini...667908.html -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Mon, April 16, 2007 - 10:20 AMI hope we are moving towards an era where human values are important regardless of which part of the planet they are born in or which god they worship. The fear mongers want an atmosphere that lead to the round up of Japanese Americans in 1942 or the repressive atmosphere of McCarthyism. I believe we can prevent such an atmosphere of hysteria by standing up to it right now.
The witch hunt was pushed back by people speaking up and organizing. The Civil Rights Movement more than any other single development helped sink an era when people were afraid to speak up.
Be it the xenophobia being promoted by people like Lou Dobbs or the anti-Islamic bigotry
of the far right I believe it can be stopped if we speak up now.
"In Germany they first came for the communists and I said nothing. Then they came for the unionists and I said nothing. Next they came for the Jews and I did not speak out. When they came for me I spoke as loud as I could, but there was no one left to hear me."
Pastor Martin Niemoller 1940 -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Mon, April 16, 2007 - 12:29 PM"xenophobia being promoted by people like Lou Dobbs"
- This comment couldn't be any further from the truth. You have your opinion but Lou Dobbs certainly does not promote xenophobia in any way. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Mon, April 16, 2007 - 12:39 PMMr. Dobbs has dedicated his entire program, 1 hour 5 days a week to attacking undocumented workers. If CNN had a clue about basic fair play they would give the same amount of time to a host who supports amnesty. MIllions of us native born citizens support our immigrant friends, coworkers and family members who struggle for citizenship rights.
Not to begin an new debate in this thread, (people can start a new thread if they wish) but Dobbs and CNN need to be called no their totally bias coverage of this important issue.
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Mon, April 16, 2007 - 12:51 PMChopper - Your opinion about Lou Dobbs isn't shared by everyone either. In fact there are a lot of people who consider him to be xenophobic. I guess if you share his opinions you wouldn't consider him to be xenophobic if you don't perceive yourself to be expressing xenophobia.
www.splcenter.org/intel/int...rticle.jsp -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Sat, April 21, 2007 - 8:28 AM* It would be nice to think that talking sense in their own language
could actually have a positive impact. Obviously, there would be no
need for such a plea if Islam were a "peaceful" religion in the first
place.
MY ADVICE TO MUSLIMS:
It Is Not Enough To Be Good; One Must Also Show The
Right Path To Others Who Might Otherwise Do Evil.
Dear Muslims!
You know that to eliminate all kinds of vices from
the world and to promote good is the responsibility
of every Muslim. Allah, the Lord of the universe,
says: "You are the best Ummah who have been created
to show the right path to the people. You command for
doing good and forbid from doing evil, and you have
faith in Allah"
The Holy Prophet (SAW) has also said that everyone
amongst you is a caretaker and is responsible for his
subordinates on the Day of Judgement. Rulers will be
answerable for the citizens of their state, every
family head will be accountable for the members of
his family and will be asked as to what he did for
their reformation, education and better life. He will
be asked as to whether he forbid them from adopting
the bad ways, and helped them in leading a pious life
or not. The Holy Quran has called this task as
"Enjoining (People) To Do Good and Forbidding (Them)
From Doing Evil."
Respected Muslims! The world history reveals that
until Muslims performed the task of commanding the
people to do good and barring them from doing evil,
the pious people remained dominant in those societies
and there was peace and tranquility and satanic
forces were subdued. But, when this collective
responsibility was designated only to clerics, and
the common Muslims ignored this task, in spite of the
efforts of the clerics, waywardness spread quickly.
A wave of offenses, terrorism, tyranny, evils, sins,
ignorance and anarchy engulfed almost every segment
of life. Disorder, commotion and chaos were on the
rise in the world society, wrecking the peace of all
mankind.
The Holy Prophet (SAW) has warned of this danger in
these words:
"I swear to the Lord Who is the Master of my soul
(it is your duty that) you must enjoin (the people)
to do good and forbid (them) from doing evil,
otherwise, the day is not far when Allah Almighty
will unleash His wrath on you, and then you will
pray (for help) to Allah, but your prayers will not
be answered." (Trimdi)
The world is facing disaster upon disaster every day
and people are expecting a major catastrophe. The
deeds that have been forbidden by God are being
committed openly. The evils are increasing, while the
virtues are fading out gradually. Tyranny, oppression
and carnage are going on, liars and cheats are
overcoming. Terrorism, bribery, corruption, evil,
nudity, vulgarity and wickedness have assaulted the
world. It seems we have reached inferno before the
Last Day. History tells us that such a situation
arises when people are being cursed by God.
It is feared that members of the previous generations
will be accountable for their individual deeds on the
Day of Judgment, but present generation will be
thrown as a whole into hell after a collective
prosecution, because the nobles of this generation
remained as silent spectators instead of restraining
the wrongdoers from committing, cruelty, sins and
misdeeds.
The Divine punishment to an ancient civilization
seconds this fear. There were three groups during
that period. One was of knaves, the second was of the
people who did good deeds but did not halt the
disobedients from transgression. The third group was
of the people who followed the Divine doctrines as
well as restrained others from disobeying them. When
God cursed the nation, the people exempted from this
torment were those who had been observing the limits
fixed by their Master and were stopping others from
wrongdoing as well.
There is another but similar happening. The residents
of a town had been engulfed by an ocean of sins.
However, there was a noble man who was always busy in
worshipping God, but he did not bother about
persuading others to give up their bad ways. When God
ordered the angels to destroy the town, He said:
" Overturn the town on the person who was anxious to
save himself from the Divine Punishment, but was not
endeavoring to save others from it".
I request the virtuous people of the world that they
should not only depend upon their prayers to save
themselves from the Divine Punishment; rather they
should lead the Evil Doers and followers of Satan who
have gone astray, to the right path. They should
undertake this task against Evil Doers with full
determination. Only then will their virtues and
prayers save them from the Divine Punishment.
S.A.Rehman
Peace Activist
PAKISTAN -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Sat, April 21, 2007 - 9:41 AMChopper - show me a "peaceful" religion other than Buddhism (which comes closest to this aspiration but is hardly a paragon of pacifist virtue either). Christianity certainly isn't peaceful. Neither is Judaism. Actually, you don't seem particularly interested in peace but rather in furthering the xenophobic and simplistic good vs evil and us vs them perspective that is antithetical to creating peace. -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Sat, April 21, 2007 - 12:51 PMAll of the above discussion has reinforced my opinion that All religion should be outlawed. -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Sat, April 21, 2007 - 12:55 PMHow can any one propose that co-existence is possible with people who advocate the death of those with whom they disagree? I looked at something on line a couple of days ago where a christian says something to the effect -While I think everyone has the right to live their own lives as they see fit, the bible does say the punishment for homosexual behavior is death.
We had better watch out or else we'll find ourselves in another dark ages type of world.
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Sat, April 21, 2007 - 1:07 PMRepressing people as a means to end repression seems a bit counter productive, no? Just as promoting xenophobia in an attempt to counteract someone else's xenophobia feeds into increased xenophobia. -
-
Re: The Truth About folks all around the world
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 11:22 AM"promoting xenophobia in an attempt to counteract someone else's xenophobia feeds into increased xenophobia. "
Maybe Gandhi's quote is appropriate: "An eye for an eye, until the whole world is blind."
Or fighting fire with fire until the whole world is in ashes. Pick your metaphor. Talk, be confrontational, even accusatory if need be, call them on their shit, but don't demonize, or you become what you fight. Fight their views, not their bodies. Protect against attacks, but think twice about using violence. If they cannot be reasoned with, if they refuse to admit even the possibility of error in their views, then they must be rejected. But not persecuted or killed. -
-
The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 12:25 PMBear "Mr. Dobbs has dedicated his entire program, 1 hour 5 days a week to attacking undocumented workers. If CNN had a clue about basic fair play they would give the same amount of time to a host who supports amnesty. MIllions of us native born citizens support our immigrant friends, coworkers and family members who struggle for citizenship rights.
Not to begin an new debate in this thread, (people can start a new thread if they wish) but Dobbs and CNN need to be called no their totally bias coverage of this important issue."
"BIAS" ??? LOL!!!???
If you want to discuss ILLEGAL immigration then I would suggest taking it to one of my ILLEGAL immigration threads - which this thread is *NOT*. Try the "religion & politics" tribe. It's typical for folks to get confused on the difference between Legal & ILLEGAL on this issue. Most in support of amnesty are not honest & tend to confuse the two & it's not accident. Folks who name call Lou Dobbs & his show "xenophobic" don't seem to understand what it means nor do they appear to view his show. So, it would appear that it comes out of ignorance & hate because Lou, actually *DOES* interview many that side with the amnesty agenda for ILLEGAL aliens & other views as well. He also has many LEGAL immigrants on the show that have gone through the steps to migrate here LEGALLY that are strongly opposed to the amnesty agenda.
Debunking the Myths Surrounding Illegal Immigration
On May 1st, Stanford students and employees rallied to support immigrant rights in the face of Senate Bill H.R. 4437, legislation aimed at cracking down on the United States’ 12 million illegal aliens. On this “Day Without Immigrants,” the supposition that xenophobia is at the root of anti-illegal-immigration legislation mutated bill H.R. 4437 into an attack on basic human rights of immigrants everywhere. Cries of “no human is illegal” smothered the truth: that the fiscal consequences of a massive undocumented population necessitate an immediate response to illegal immigration in the United States.
The notion that the “Day Without Immigrants” was a defense of human rights is founded upon a false presumption that xenophobia is the only possible explanation for anti-illegal-immigration sentiment in the United States. Protestors justified the “Day Without Immigrants” as a human rights initiative by asserting that the native-born American population is incapable of drawing the line between illegal and legal immigration, but rather views each with equal animosity. This is simply wrong. According to a national poll conducted in March by The Pew Research Center, only 22% of Americans say that legal and illegal immigration are equally problematic, while 60% say that illegal immigration is a bigger problem than legal immigration. A whopping 80% of Americans believe immigrants from Latin America work very hard, and 80% believe immigrants from Latin America have strong family values. These figures are up from 63% and 75%, respectively, in 1997. It would be an understatement to say that the United States is tolerant of its immigrant population. Anti-illegal-immigration opinion is rooted in legitimate fiscal considerations, not xenophobia..........
enjoy the full article -
www.stanfordreview.org/Archiv...4.shtml
; -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 1:05 PMAnother poll on CNN reported that over 3/4 of U.S. citizens believe that undocumented workers currently in the U.S. should be given a chance for legal citizenship.
Major unions in the U.S. are active in the fight for legalization. Many in the union leadership feel that the future of their unions depends on organizing those who are currently undocumented.
New rallies for Amnesty are being organized for May 1st, 2007. This is now the second year in a row that International Workers Day will be celebrated in the U.S. this century. This had Dobbs upset last year. He failed to tell his viewers that May Day was born on American soil in Chicago. It commerates the struggle of immigrant workers in 19th century America. It also is a rememberance of the Haymarket Martyrs. International Workers Day was actually an export to the rest of the world. The immigrants of the 21st century have just brought the holiday back home.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 3:32 PMAnd once again, take your ILLEGAL immigration topic to an ILLEGAL immigration thread or I will delete this thread and start over.
'Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway'
"Quietly but systematically, the Bush Administration is advancing the plan to build a huge NAFTA Super Highway, four football-fields-wide, through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35, from the Mexican border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth, Minn.
Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, bypassing the Longshoreman’s Union in the process. The Mexican trucks, without the involvement of the Teamsters Union, will drive on what will be the nation’s most modern highway straight into the heart of America. The Mexican trucks will cross border in FAST lanes, checked only electronically by the new “SENTRI” system. The first customs stop will be a Mexican customs office in Kansas City, their new Smart Port complex, a facility being built for Mexico at a cost of $3 million to the U.S. taxpayers in Kansas City...
The details of the NAFTA Super Highway are hidden in plan view. Still, Bush has not given speeches to bring the NAFTA Super Highway plans to the full attention of the American public. Missing in the move toward creating a North American Union is the robust public debate that preceded the decision to form the European Union. All this may be for calculated political reasons on the part of the Bush Administration.
A good reason Bush does not want to secure the border with Mexico may be that the administration is trying to create express lanes for Mexican trucks to bring containers with cheap Far East goods into the heart of the U.S., all without the involvement of any U.S. union workers on the docks or in the trucks." Checkout the map - www.humanevents.com/article.php
Post your ILLEGAL immigration topics in ILLEGAL immigration threads please -
tribes.tribe.net/politicsnreligion
tribes.tribe.net/politicsnreligion -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 3:49 PMSo you can post your opinion, but differing opinions are not allowed? Fair play in the tradition of Lou Dobbs.
The problem would be over if those who are now illegal were made legal.
Would you also have my opinion about immigration made illegal?
Coopper, you can delete me from this tribe and any others that you moderate, but this little corner of the internet is the only venue where you will ever shut me up.
This may well be deleted folks, I'll contact the rest of you by private or I'll be in other tribes.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 4:04 PMGet your head out of your ass Bear, I'm not asking you to shut-up or go away-------ALL I'm asking is to be on topic. All I'm asking is to post ILLEGAL immigration posts in an ILLEGAL immigration thread as I've already said several times now. I've even offered for you to join my politics tribe to share your views. What part of that are you not getting? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, April 25, 2007 - 5:59 PMthe part where you keep saying stay on topic while posting twice on illegal immigration. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, April 27, 2007 - 10:24 PMThe Muslim Brotherhood
www.fas.org/irp/world/para/mb.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood
Enjoy the VIDEO - www.taoofdefiance.com/2006/11...project/
; -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, April 28, 2007 - 4:45 AMOutfits such as Muslim Brotherhood do not speak for the majority of Islamic Communities in North America or in Europe. There are to be sure some fundamentalists, but huge parts of those communities are adopting modern secular attitudes such as tolerance.
Imagine the hell that a person goes thru if they were born lesbian or gay in an Islamic nation or community (or the Bible belt)
here is a link to some Muslims in Canada who happen to be gay or lesbian. www.salaamcanada.org/intro.html
I hope that people with a humanist perspective can appreciate that just as all Christians are not bomb throwing anti-choice zealots or violent homophobes, neither are all Muslims terrorists or haters.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Xenophobia, and what is once was....
Sun, April 29, 2007 - 11:01 AMmany decades ago xenophobia was actually a way to get the other person to speak UP for the country they were in or to trash it and there fore prove they were ANTI-here.... that was all. Instead of deep meaningful debate it was a way to recognize citizen from FOE. But in the 50's 60's and 70's the idea of "ETHNIC" identity was warped from being a citizen who immigrated to being WHO you were and what COUNTRY you identified with. This was a clever ruse to undermine America during the time AFTER world war 2... and has succeeded in weakening America and strengthing NON Americans.... which isn't a bad thing PER se... but does tip the balance of power, and disrupt peace. With more than one peace maker, comes POLITICS and corruption. Deals and back stabs and innocent un suspecting people get plowed under in the chaotic melee, and only those with evil concentrated intentions can grab enough power to be a threat to stability. Common folk get displaced, and Republic and Democratic (not the parties.... the STYLES of government) pay the price, and people who do 911 get the upper hand, and use those tactice to SUPPRESS, OPRESS or murder disenters... instead of having a trial by peers and the civilized fashion we know... we will have more vigilantees and less structured courts... and Regular citizens will be provoked into doing BAD when they are merely defending themselves. Of course if the regular folk who are being offended reply with humor... the person encouraging the provocation is the one who gets violent. So either way.... Good violently misplaced, or EVIL just being EVIL.... roll the dice, make or fail your saving throw, the results are the same excerpt good always loses. -
-
The Truth About Islam
Thu, May 3, 2007 - 1:19 PM"Suicide Killers" - Islam is "Beautiful?"
On last night's "Daily Show," John Stewart hosted a French filmmaker named Pierre Rehov, whose recent creation "Suicide Killers" presents the views of would-be Muslim "bombers for God." Rehov made a point to state repeatedly that because he is French, he is sympathetic with the suicide killers.
* Is the suppression and oppression - the torture - of women "beautiful?"
* Is the constant call for the deaths of infidels something "beautiful?"
* Is the repression of sex to the point of driving young men to want to kill themselves and others somehow "beautiful?"
For the rest of the blog - tbknews.blogspot.com/
The rest of us MUST speak out very loudly while we still can against the Insanity of Islam. Or we can wait until it's too late like, AFTER Sharia Law has been implemented in Europe, Canada etc. WAKE-UP Folks! -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, May 3, 2007 - 1:34 PM<<AFTER Sharia Law has been implemented in Europe, Canada etc. >>
don't you think if they've legally emigrated, and legally changed the laws, that they are totally within their rights to do so? i do, scary as that thought is. i would like to change lots of laws to be isomorphic with my pov, but hey... that's how the shit goes down.
if people who are already here are so soporific and blissfully unaware of their rights and responsibilities, they probably don't deserve them anyway.
where's my burqa? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, May 3, 2007 - 2:31 PMAli,
What part of this were you not getting?
Sharia Law in Germany -- Well On The Way!
An excellent 8-part article in Der Spiegel. Seems at least some
Germans are waking up to the dangers of multi-cultural tolerance,
towards those who are fully intolerant, and plan to eventually "take
over". Americans, Brits, Europeans, Canadians... especially women!
Read and learn. This is happening in your territory as well. J.D.
*Part 1: Paving the Way for a Muslim Parallel Society
www.spiegel.de/internatio...629,00.html
A recent ruling in Germany by a judge who cited the Koran underscores
the dilemma the country faces in reconciling Western values with a
growing immigrant population. A disturbing number of rulings are
helping to create a parallel Muslim world in Germany that is
welcoming to Islamic fundamentalists. ...
*Part 2: Does Germany already Have Sharia Law?
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-2,00.html
Ursula Spuler-Stegemann, an Islam expert from the central German
university town of Marburg, has a similar take on the matter. "Do we
already have Sharia here?" she asks, adding that the Frankfurt case
shows that "things are getting out of hand here." ...
*Part 3: Violating the Principles of Equal Treatment
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-3,00.html
For far too long, Germany's muslim immigrants were not asked to put
much effort into integrating. For decades, German judges essentially
paved the way for Islamic fundamentalists to form a parallel society.
They raised little opposition to the strategy employed by Islamic
groups to demand their supposed religious freedom in court until they
got it. But the judges must have known, argues Johannes Kandel, that
"giving preferential treatment to groups violates the principle of
equal treatment in a secular legal system. ...
*Part 4: Giving the Muezzin Free Reign
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-4,00.html
Muslims can also often count on the support of German courts when it
comes to building mosques. As far back as 1992, the Federal
Administrative Court ruled that neighbors must "fundamentally accept"
being woken before sunup. ...
*Part 5: The Camel Fatwa and other Letters from Absurdistan
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-5,00.html
This was an attitude that still prevailed in the minds of German
judges one year after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks. At the time,
the higher administrative court in the state of North
Rhine-Westphalia ruled that a female Muslim student in the 10th grade
should be permitted not to take part in a school trip. The family had
argued that Islam prohibits allowing girls to go on such trips
without being accompanied by a male family member. The family also
insisted that the girl was constantly worried about losing her
headscarf. The judges found that such fears were "comparable with the
situation of a partially mentally impaired person who, because of her
disability, can only travel with a companion." This assessment was
devastating because it accepted the rules of a camel drivers' society
in the modern age -- literally, because a few years earlier, an
Islamic legal opinion dubbed the "camel fatwa" had been added to the
professional literature. ...
*Part 6: "Integration Has Failed Here"
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-6,00.html
Experiences in urban German schools show just how much integration
has suffered as a result of the decisions of timorous judges in past
years. At the Carlo Mierendorff School in Preungesheim, a Frankfurt
neighborhood, about one-third of students in the upper grades are
permitted to not attend class trips for religious reasons, says
Alexander Zabler, the school's principal. To prevent their daughters
from traveling with schoolmates, many Muslim parents have either
called the girls in sick or simply ordered them not to show up.
Zabler tried many approaches, including talking to the parents,
visiting them at home, offering special meals for Muslims during
travel -- but all to no avail. Finally he turned to the government
and asked the local school board for help -- also to no avail. He has
since resigned. ...
*Part 7: Forced Marriages and Servility
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-7,00.html
Of course, in many families there is no escaping the closeness
justified by Muslim traditions and rules. Women are brought up to
serve and obey. Boys are alternately spoiled and beaten, as custom
requires. According to a study conducted by the Lower Saxony
Criminology Research Institute, physical abuse of boys is more than
twice as common in Turkish families than German families. And "girls
from conservative families say that their fathers and brothers have
the right to hit them," reports Judith Gerling-Tamer, an educator at
the Elisi Evi Support Center for women and girls in Berlin's heavily
Muslim Kreuzberg district. ...
*Part 8: Europe at a Crossroads
www.spiegel.de/internatio...9-8,00.html
Berlin attorney Seyran Ates says: "We are at a crossroads, everywhere
in Europe. Do we allow structures that lead straight into a parallel
society, or do we demand assimilation into the democratic
constitutional state?" ... -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, May 3, 2007 - 2:59 PMHere we go back to the 8 th century. I posted in another tribe about an article concerning Somali taxi drivers who refuse to pick up female fares because it is against their religion. Single women should not be out in public. I am surprised that the women in the mid west accept this kind of treatment. muslim cashiers in local stores will not ring up customer's pork purchases because their religion doesn't allow them to touch pork. These people have no place in a modern society. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 7:10 AMchopper, stop being so simplistic.
i'll say it again - if they do it legally, then so be it. i believe the quote goes along the lines of "the people get the government they deserve" .. if people are so lazy and stupid that they allow for *any* religion to make laws, they deserve that punishment. maybe that will serve to enlighten them (ooh, here's another one ... if the fool would persist in his folly, he would become wise)
and no one is going back to the 8th century without complicity. half the people bitching about the war were people who voted for it (or bush).
dig?
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 7:55 AMAli, we have something called the US Constitution that protects us from establishing a religious gov't. We have the right to expose the facts to shed light on any issue & that includes any religion.
"half the people bitching about the war were people who voted for it (or bush)."
- 50 some million out 300 million? No, that "half" of the people that voted is only 30% Reps. 30% dems so there's a 40% majority that didn't vote. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 7:58 AMBesides, whether you voted for the war or not, there's nothing illegal or immoral about changing your mind and deciding the war is not a good idea now. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 9:07 AM<<Ali, we have something called the US Constitution that protects us from establishing a religious gov't.>>
where does it say that?
<<Besides, whether you voted for the war or not, there's nothing illegal or immoral about changing your mind and deciding the war is not a good idea now.>>
no, but it sure is hypocritical.
I certainly don't want religion in my government... but i also don't want built-in xenophobia. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 9:19 AMWell, hypocrisy would be immoral in my book. I don't think changing your mind is *necessarily* immoral.
It could be in some circumstances, of course. It would be hypocritical if the reasons you were in favor of it originally are identical to the reasons you are opposed to it now, *and* the situation hasn't changed in a way that would make the application of those principles different. It would be hypocritical if the change in mind was made for reasons of convenience, i.e., to follow public sentiment, or to beat up on people who still support the war.
It would not be hypocritical at all if you change your mind and say you've changed your mind because you have better information now than you had before; or simply acknowledge you made a mistake before; or change your mind because what you know now was different from what you thought you knew before; and so forth.
Not saying there aren't a lot of hypocrites who voted for the war, of course. I'd just like to see more politicians in general feel free to change their minds without having some knee-jerk judgment of hypocrisy or fence-jumping leveled at them by political extremists on all sides who are more interested in ideologically hurting the people they hate, than in having good government. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 9:35 AMi shouldn't have used such a loaded reference.
<<and no one is going back to the 8th century without complicity. >>
was my point... which i unintentionally obfuscated. if people aren't going to be involved in government, they will only be governed.
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 9:37 AM<<Ali, we have something called the US Constitution that protects us from establishing a religious gov't.>>
Ali "where does it say that? "
First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..."
The U.S. Constitution is a wholly secular & legal document. It contains no mention of Jesus Christ, Christianity or god. In fact, the Constitution refers to religion only twice –in the First Amendment, which bars laws "respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," and in Article VI, which prohibits "religious tests" for public office. Both of these provisions are evidence that the country was not founded as officially Christian (who's version?). Our nation was founded as a secular government, based on the authority of "We, the People," not a god, king, or dictator. The U.S.A. is the first nation in history to separate church and state.
Get informed at the 'Separation of Church & State' tribe -
separationofchurchstate.tribe.net -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 9:42 AM<<- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." >>
um... i think you've confused "freedom 'of' religion" with "freedom 'from' religion"
that doesn't logically (or legally) follow that laws can't line up with religious beliefs. try "thou shalt not kill"
:) -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 4, 2007 - 12:06 PMAli, I'm afraid you are wrong from a legal standpoint. The Supreme Court has upheld the freedom from religion on numerous occasions. Just as the freedom of speech includes the freedom not to speak, the freedom to worship includes the freedom not to. Enforced prayer for instance. Sharia states you must pray five times a day in the direction of Mecca. And, by the way, under Sharia, politicians would face a religious "test" as well. Bad way to make law in any event, as all religions are built on lies, and bad laws are also often built on lies.
Oh, and about people voting Sharia in being okay. No, again. The Constitution of the United States is designed to protect the rights of the minority from the whims of the majority. That is why it is so difficult to change, and should remain so. That is also why so many new laws are struck down as unconstitutional. It's a wonderful document, and why I was so willing to take an oath to defend it "against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Someone else attacked another poster as bigoted, because he/she advocated ridding the world of Islam. Bigotry is not hatred of a religion, it is hatred of people. Religion is merely an idea. In my view, a bad one. Some, like Islam, are worse ideas than others. You can hate an idea, and not hate those that believe in it. A better term might be chauvinism. The belief that your whatever is better than the whatever of the other guy. Prior to the feminists appropriating it to describe misogynistic males, it didn't carry quite such a pejorative connotation.
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, May 5, 2007 - 2:02 AM"i think you've confused freedom 'of' religion with freedom 'from' religion"
Think this through.
If it is illegal to have a religious test for public officials, you can't force elected officials to be a member of a certain religion. You can't say, ok, everyone on a ballot MUST BE a christian, or a muslim, or whatever. Nor can you force them to adhere to a certain incarnation of a religion - you can't force them to be Roman Catholic, or Lutheran, or any other specific sect or subgroup of any other religion. You can't force them all to be a member of that particular church or mosque over on fourth street.
Outlawing this sort of requirement means that people of any religious belief and practice may run for office. Anyone can put themselves on the ballot, and you can't even ask them what their religion is, or whether they have a religion, in order to decide whether they can run.
So much for Article VI.
As regards the first amendment, if Congress is prohibited from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, then they can't make laws forcing citizens to religious observance. Nor can they make laws proscribing citizens from religious observance. Both types of law are illegal, because the only way to pass such laws is through Congress, and they are prohibited from enacting such laws. Even regulatory agencies, who are given broad authority to make rules that have the force of law, get their authority ultimately from Congressional action, so even an agency that made a religious rule of these sorts would be doing something illegal, because it goes beyond the authority that Congress may legally grant to them.
This isn't just some idiosyncratic interpretation of the Constitution, by the way. These matters have been tested in our judiciary periodically for a couple hundred years, and the interpretations of these laws is quite clear and has been consistent over that time.
"that doesn't logically (or legally) follow that laws can't line up with religious beliefs."
Right. It could be a religious belief that you shouldn't point a gun at someone in order to steal their money, and it is true that we have a law against pointing a gun at someone and stealing their money. But the law prohibiting pointing a gun at someone and stealing their money is not a religious law, it is a civil law. It is not a law interpreted by religious leaders who gain office through fulfilling religious requirements and by performance of religious duties; it is interpreted by judges whose appointment is regulated by other civil law, and whose actions are limited by still other laws. Under our Constitutional law, there can be no religious test for judges - you can't legally mandate that all judges also have to be priests in the Roman Catholic Church, for example. So while civil law can be very similar to religious law in some respects, it is very importantly different in another respect, and that is that it is illegal for such laws to be interpreted and enforced by religious organizations. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, May 6, 2007 - 9:18 AM"'God has set a seal upon their hearts and ears; their sight is dimmed and grievous punishment awaits them.' (Q 2:2-6)"
"What kind of God blindfolds his own creations so they don't see the error of their ways or the behavior I would think he would prefer them to follow? This makes no sense!!! Is it any wonder people who follow these religions(Islam & Christianity) sometimes exhibit schizophrenic type behavior?"
From Anonymous on tbknews.blogspot.com. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, May 6, 2007 - 10:18 AMWho Wrote the Koran?
As to the Koran, the Muslim holy book, Walker says:
"Mohammedan scriptures, often erroneously thought to have been written by Mohammed. Moslems don't believe this. But many don't know the Koran was an enlarged revised version of the ancient Word of the Goddess Kore, revered by Mohammed's tribe, the Koreshites (Children of Kore), who guarded her shrine at Mecca.
"The original writing was done long before Mohammed's time by holy imams, a word related to Semitic ima, 'mother.' Like the original mahatmas or 'great mothers' of India, the original imams were probably priestesses of the old Arabian matriarchate. It was said they took the scripture from a prototype that existed in heaven from the beginning of eternity, 'Mother of the Book'--i.e., the Goddess herself, wearing the Book of Fate on her breast as Mother Tiamat wore the Tablets of Destiny. Sometimes the celestial Koran was called the Preserved Tablet. There was some resemblance between this and other legendary books of divine origin, such as the Ur-text, the Book of Thoth, and the Emerald Tablet of Hermes.
"As in the case of the Judeo-Christian Bible, the Koran was much rewritten to support new patriarchal laws and to obliterate the figures of the Goddess and her priestesses."
As Walker says, the Koran was not written by Mohammed. In The Great Religious Leaders, Potter says of Mohammed, "It is very doubtful that he read any of the Bible: indeed, it has not been proved that he ever read anything, or wrote anything. He called himself 'the illiterate prophet.'"
Regarding the unoriginality of the Koran, Daniel Pipes says (The Jerusalem Post, 5/12/00):
"The Koran is a not 'a product of Muhammad or even of Arabia,' but a collection of earlier Judeo-Christian liturgical materials stitched together to meet the needs of a later age."
Indeed, the Koran was created over a period of decades, if not centuries, and does not represent a single "revelation" from the Almighty to Mohammed.
Who Was Mohammed?
Like that of Buddha, Jesus, Moses, et al., Mohammed's historicity is questionable. He seems to be yet another incarnation ("Neros") invented to create a "state" religion. His "history" is full of fantastic legends, but if we were to find an individual there, it would not be one of very high or affable character. As Potter says:
"Of women, his taste ran to widows with a temper... For recreation he delighted in cobbling shoes. Perhaps his greatest joy was when he beheld the severed heads of his enemies.
"His dislikes were just as varied. He detested silk-lined clothes, interest charges, dogs, others' lies, Jews and Christians. He hated poets, and said, 'Every painter will be in hell.'
"He was inordinately vain. A clever woman poet satirized him. She was slain when asleep with her child at her breast, and the vengeful Muhammad praised her murderer. Once he tortured a Jew to find the location of hidden treasure and then had him killed and added the widow to his harem. Strange indeed was the character of the prophet. How could such a person inspire such reverence and devotion? It is one of the puzzles of history.
"It was not that he developed a great theology, either, for what little theology Islam has, worthy of the name, was built up after Muhammad had long been dead."
According to the hadiths or hadees, records of the sayings and traditions of Mohammed and his companions, the Prophet was indeed of a character that would repulse any decent human being. One after another of the hadiths discuss Mohammed's insatiable sexual appetite, which included having sex with his "wife" who was 9 years old and who had not even reached puberty. All the while, this dirty old man had nothing but contempt for women.
As to how such a character could inspire such reverence and devotion, we would submit that it was because Mohammed and Islam were created by yet another faction of "the brotherhood" for purposes of competition with Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and other religions. As N.A Morozov says:
"...until the Crusades Islam was indistinguishable from Judaism and...only then did it receive its independent character, while Muhammad and the first Caliphs are mythical figures."
Behind the creation of such ideologies are usually those who benefit the most, particularly "third-party" weapons manufacturers, since these divisive ideologies are forever setting one culture against another.
www.truthbeknown.com/islam.htm
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, May 6, 2007 - 10:28 AM"But many don't know the Koran was an enlarged revised version of the ancient Word of the Goddess Kore, revered by Mohammed's tribe, the Koreshites (Children of Kore), who guarded her shrine at Mecca. "
As in David Koresh?! (Branch Davidians.) Odd coincidence.
=;-/
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, May 7, 2007 - 7:49 AMerik
<<Ali, I'm afraid you are wrong from a legal standpoint. The Supreme Court has upheld the freedom from religion on numerous occasions.>>
where? i'm curious.
<<Enforced prayer for instance. Sharia states you must pray five times a day in the direction of Mecca. And, by the way, under Sharia, politicians would face a religious "test" as well.>>
ok.. clearly, i'm not a lawyer, but ....well, if you can't pass a law that's in conflict with a previous law (without changing the original) i don't see the threat. that, or i've sorely misunderstood the structure of our legislature.
<<Oh, and about people voting Sharia in being okay. No, again. The Constitution of the United States is designed to protect the rights of the minority from the whims of the majority.>>
omfg... hold on... let me stop laughing. protect the rights of the minority?! ok...
<<Someone else attacked another poster as bigoted, because he/she advocated ridding the world of Islam. Bigotry is not hatred of a religion, it is hatred of people. >>
we're really splitting hairs, eh? hatred, last time i checked, wasn't healthy for anything.
hero
<<If it is illegal to have a religious test for public officials, you can't force elected officials to be a member of a certain religion.>>
huh? want to run that by me one more time? i don't see how that relates, but ok.
<<As regards the first amendment, if Congress is prohibited from making laws respecting the establishment of religion, then they can't make laws forcing citizens to religious observance. Nor can they make laws proscribing citizens from religious observance.>>
right... but as you've stated, the laws can and do match up with religious beliefs. i'm simply stating (again..for the third or fourth time now) ... that as much as i can't stand any religion, people should feel free to do what they want. if they want to worship rocks or the secret or a penny-farting unicorn, fine.
but to claim to be a 'secular humanist' and spend all your time trying to tear down religious institutions (or worse, ideas... i mean, you have seen how the war on drugs and the war on terror works, right? ideas don't get killed! i can guarantee i'll find you a flat earther somewhere here on tribe...), rather than free their captives seems a touch hypocritical, and lazy.
<<But the law prohibiting pointing a gun at someone and stealing their money is not a religious law, it is a civil law>>
and? like i've said .. and will say again ... how is that any different than if something lined up with sharia? i'd bet good money that we already have laws that line up with sharia... just like we have laws that line up with the ten commandments and probably the torah... but if you still misunderstand me, well... don't worry too much. i don't.
(btw ... every time i read 'sharia' all i can hear is Rock the Casbah)
and chopper, do you call yourself that because you cut and paste everything you 'say'? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, May 7, 2007 - 8:48 AM"i'm simply stating (again..for the third or fourth time now) ... that as much as i can't stand any religion, people should feel free to do what they want. if they want to worship rocks or the secret or a penny-farting unicorn, fine."
Indeed. I guess I'm not following the legal argument here - the constitution prevents the government from banning or mandating the worship of rocks or penny-farthing unicorns, etc.
"but to claim to be a 'secular humanist' and spend all your time trying to tear down religious institutions (or worse, ideas... i mean, you have seen how the war on drugs and the war on terror works, right? ideas don't get killed! i can guarantee i'll find you a flat earther somewhere here on tribe...), rather than free their captives seems a touch hypocritical, and lazy."
Sometimes freeing their captives entails attacks on the institutions and ideas that have seduced their followers.
"how is that any different than if something lined up with sharia?"
In sharia, your judge would be a muslim scholar who finds you guilty or not, and sentences you, in part based on considerations that have nothing to do with the crime you are accused of. For example, if you rape someone, your guilt may be affected by how observant a muslim you are, and the sentence you face may be different as well.
In the US, your guilt is based on the rule of law, and is adjudicated by a person who may or may not have religious beliefs, but who is prohibited from imposing those religious beliefs in the course of judging and sentencing.
For me, that's a significant and important difference.
"i'd bet good money that we already have laws that line up with sharia..."
We have laws that cover many of the same topics, and sometimes in broadly the same way, though often with some dramatic differences in penalty. A lot of fundamentalist and evangelical Christians support laws that are identical to many laws under sharia and I suppose some of those laws have been passed in some jurisdictions. None of this is obscure:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia
I guess I don't see the point here. The US has laws that ban theft, and sharia has laws that ban theft. But there are qualitative differences in those laws and in the manner of their adjudication that I think most people would find to be important. (To say nothing of the inability of a US court to order the amputation of your hands based on the testimony of only two people who might just dislike you.)
As for the religious test for public office thing, I thought you were maintaining that such a thing was currently legal in the US. Apparently, I'm mistaken. I'm not sure I see the point here either. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Tue, May 8, 2007 - 10:58 AMI love how this article explains the tactics used by Muslims when Islam is exposed for what it really is...
"Most of us are by now familiar with his marriage to nine-year-old Aisha. He first spotted her, and was "betrothed" to her, when she was six. And yet if one brings this up with Muslims, many of them attempt to deny her age. They will claim such things as "oh, she was actually nineteen" or "oh, no one knows her exact age" or "the texts are unclear." You can find all about this from the defectors from Islam -- in such books as Ibn Warraq's Why I Am Not a Muslim and at Ali Sina's site www.faithfreedom.org.
They attempt to distract attention -- the Tu-Quoque part of the Taqiyya-and-Tu-Quoque, which long ago was alliteratively offered as a summary of Muslim propaganda techniques. Or they attempt to express amazement and surprise, and feign uncertainty ("I'll have to check on that"). If, however, you are sure of yourself and you hold your ground, and even dare to quote from the texts (quoting, say, the part about the little girl playing with her toys), if you adduce the evidence, then that embarrassed attempt at evasion becomes, suddenly, the fury it always was. Your Muslim interlocutor will reveal, under the smiles and wiles, quite soon and quite often, a hysterical rage.
And then you will be told, as well, that you are bringing this up for no good reason, you are merely interested in attacking Islam. And then there is the one final attempt to undo you: you are told that the parts about little Aisha are, in fact, being "taken out of context." And in this case the context is not words, but time: seventh-century Arabia. (Oh, there is plenty of "taking out of context," but it is all by apologists for Islam..."
www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwa....php#more
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 6:58 AM<<"how is that any different than if something lined up with sharia?">>
<<In sharia, your judge would be a muslim scholar who finds you guilty or not...>>
ok... we've run into a semantic blockage here... sharia as an entire system would most definitely be unconstitutional. bits and pieces of it certainly are not. this is merely part of choppers smear campaign against an idea, which he likes to distort and use to create xenophobia and general fear.
i bet if chopper came in here yakking about the "truth" about judaism or christianity, there'd be quite a different reaction.
and chopper... <cut> <paste> or do you have any .... thoughts of your own?
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 7:52 AM"...if chopper came in here yakking about the "truth" about judaism [sic] or christianity [sic], there'd be quite a different reaction."
Not really. He pretty much slams all systems of deluded belief in some supernatural being, equally. Undoubtedly there would be apologists for each, babbling on about their special magical friend, just as on this thread. Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc., are all as big a lie as Islam. Islam just happens to be the least well-adapted to the realities of the modern world. Realities like fundamental human rights.
None the less, I think there is a semantic blockage here. Perhaps I can unblock it for you. Sharia is a system of laws, as answers to certain universal human ills, and is legitimized as the supposed word of Allah. These ills, and many methods for determining guilt or innocence, and mandating punishments, existed long before some desert brigand invented his own religion, and will long after the last Korans are relegated to the same museums that contain momentos of all our other disgarded mythologies. The legal system in the U.S., is a system of laws, as answers to certain universal human ills (not always the same ills, but some certainly are, i.e. murder, theft, assault, certain other anti-social behaviors), legitimized through collective recognition of the legitimacy of the U.S. Constitution. A sort of social contract, or compact as Hobbes would have called it. Under that Constitution, certain crimes (say, homosexuality or sex before marriage) stipulated in Sharia, are protected rights. In addition, punishments for crimes under Sharia (such as stoning, amputation, blinding, tooth extraction, beheading, various forms of revenge, etc.) would be considered unconstitutional, as they would be deemed cruel and unusual in nature.
I hope that clears it up a little. Your argument carries no more weight than the fundamentalist Christian argument that our laws are based on the ten commandments. Nope. The ten commandments were just another bunch of laws, created in order to deal with some of the same or similar social ills. If they were the law of the nation, I'd be long dead, under a pile of rocks, by now. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 8:02 AMmy bad... i see fifi has already said this in a much more succinct manner.
<<Bigotry results when you hold up one group as an example while ignoring or accepting the same behavior from people in or associated with your own identity.>>
and as for this
<<He pretty much slams all systems of deluded belief in some supernatural being, equally.>>
great. is that the pinnacle of secular humanism? or is this just a place where his xenophobia and fear find traction? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 8:41 AMA "to distort and use to create xenophobia and general fear."
- No, you're just not payin attention...as I do share the quotes right out of the Koran. Any attempt by you to distract from the facts, will not work.
A "i bet if chopper came in here yakking about the "truth" about judaism or christianity, there'd be quite a different reaction."
- No, just from you...as Erik said, I expose the facts about all Abrahamic religions & others with horrible Ideology as well. Any group that uses god as an excuse to kill others who don't believe as they do.
<<Bigotry results when you hold up one group as an example while ignoring or accepting the same behavior from people in or associated with your own identity.>>
- Nice try but this is the Islam thread where we discuss Islam...not Christianity or Judaism - as they have their own threads as well. I see that you have no problem discussing those religions at all - you just don't want anybody to expose the facts about Islam. Well, tough shit.
Enjoy the VIDEOS
Sexual Abuse of Children Authorized by Islamic Clerics
www.youtube.com/watch
Islam: Governing Under Sharia
www.cfr.org/publication/8034/
Londonstan Sharia Law - VIDEO (The War Within)
www.youtube.com/watch
SHARIA LAW 101 Seeking forward in the England & Europe
www.youtube.com/watch
Islam: The Culture of Hatred
www.youtube.com/watch
; -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 8:49 AMhey chopper..
i have no vested interest in islam. i do have a vested interest in logical thinking and tolerance. which is what secular humanism is about, in case you missed it.
<<Nice try but this is the Islam thread where we discuss Islam...>>
oh, yes, i forgot - from chopper, the master of staying 'on topic'. how long will it be until you delete this thread too?
you strike me as a very fearful person... i just don't and will never share that with you. why don't you just start your own (dia)tribe about hating religion, instead of trying to disguise your racist and xenophobic views as secular humanism?
building bridges is a hell of a lot harder than blowing them up.
and btw ... maybe spending some time outdoors (there's a big world out there, choppy) would help, rather than watching (and posting links to) 20 hours of youtube per day. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 9:46 AMHey there once again Ali, still don't know what an ad hominem is do you - even though you just applied a couple to your last post. It demonstrates the weakness of your argument.
I see you still don't get it. There's a monumental difference between "hate" & exposing the facts about heinous Ideologies . Everything I've brought here is either in the Koran or in the videos. Maybe you need to have another view of the description of this tribe & what Secular Humanism is.
A "i do have a vested interest in logical thinking and tolerance."
- Why start now?
A "why don't you just start your own (dia)tribe about hating religion, instead of trying to disguise your racist and xenophobic views as secular humanism?"
- I don't need to, I have the Secular Humanist tribe, the Separation of church & state tribe etc, etc. Which is neither "racist" nor "xenophobic", as you would like to believe but nice try.
"You have no concern about the poor people who are suffering daily from Islam's terrible yoke, but wish to castigate ME for bringing it up. Rather appalling, I'd say.
What is really divisive is the denial that prevents people from inspecting clearly the follies that will surely destroy them, including and especially heinous religious ideologies that claim to originate with an omnipotent tyrant in the sky.
Unity will appear only when all people of conscience condemn all condemnable ideologies and practices."
www.blogger.com/comment.g
That was very well said & appropriate here...read it as slowly & as many times as it takes until it all sinks in Ali.
A "building bridges is a hell of a lot harder than blowing them up. "
- LOL, speaking of blowing things up...
what do you think Muslims have been doing? This certainly displays the Idiocy of your understanding of the situation & your argument. You care not for those innocent folks who have been blown up - your only concern is that the facts about Islam & its heinous Ideology might get exposed for all to see. Yeah, your motives are getting more & more clear all the time.
Your own HATE for exposing Islam for what it really is, is clear. Again, You have no concern about the poor people who are suffering daily from Islam's terrible yoke, but wish to castigate ME for bringing it up. Rather appalling, I'd say. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 11:49 AM<<Hey there once again Ali, still don't know what an ad hominem is do you - even though you just applied a couple to your last post. It demonstrates the weakness of your argument.>>
i'll just laugh now. is it clearer to you yet? btw .. the ad hominem remark was about lou dobbs, not even in this thread.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 11:50 AM<<Unity will appear only when all people of conscience condemn all condemnable ideologies and practices>>
you mean, like the condemnable ideology of 'memephobia' which you expound in nearly every post? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 1:31 PMLOL, still don't get it do you. You must have alethiaphobia.
Once again, you demonstrate absolutely no concern for the murder of innocent folks - you'd rather spend your time attacking the exposure of it. Which only serves to keep the barbaric abuse on-going. You are as bad as the Islamic fundamentalists. Again, your distractions will not serve you as I am on to you. Once you read the Koran to see the quotes for yourself & see the videos of Muslims desire to attack all Infidels you'll see just how "peaceful" & "Beautiful" a religion it is *NOT*
but never mind that, you'd rather continue with your irrelevant ad homs & other fallacies. Which everyone here can see as clear as glass. If you don't like this thread then, don't post in it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 1:52 PM<<Once again, you demonstrate absolutely no concern for the murder of innocent folks>>
you must believe you are doing quite a service, then... how many have you saved?
<<Again, your distractions will not serve you as I am on to you.>>
you wish you were 'on to me'
and ... Did you mean: althaiophobia?? yes, i am terrified of marshmallows. and bad arguments.
i have the sinking feeling that i have punched yet another tar baby. wiser heads in this tribe just ignore you... i think i'll take note. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 4:05 PMYou HATE the exposure of the fact that Islam is anything but peaceful. That's right, you can't stand it. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 8:38 PMBE AWARE - Secularism under pressure as Islamic leaders rise in Turkey
ISTANBUL, TURKEY - Perched on a high hill overlooking Istanbul's old city, the Pierre Loti cafe is named after a 19th-century French bon vivant whose sensual tales of his time in the Ottoman capital have fueled the imaginations of countless tourists.
Earlier this year, the local mayor tried to rename the area around the cafe after an Islamic saint whose tomb – a popular Muslim pilgrimage site – is nearby, enraging Turkish secularists. One secularist member of Istanbul's city council accused the mayor, a member of the Islamic-rooted Justice and Development Party (AKP), of being part of a larger plan of Islamization.
It is a charge that is being heard increasingly often in Turkey. Founded on secular ideals by Kemal Ataturk after World War I, the majority-Muslim republic is embroiled in a deep political crisis pitting the AKP-led government against secularists, who fear the liberal Islamic party is gaining too much power. Hundreds of thousands of Turks have turned out for massive rallies held nationwide in recent weeks, frequently expressing the concern that the AKP is enacting incremental local changes that are eroding the country's secular foundations.
Much of the concern has focused on the AKP's recent effort to have its foreign minister, Abdullah Gul, elected by parliament as president – an effort that was successfully blocked by Turkey's secular opposition parties.
"Secularism, the regime of the country, is in danger," says Hasan Husseyin Engin, a chemical engineer who was among an estimated 1 million Turks at an April 29 pro-secularism rally in Istanbul. "The government is not obeying the rules of the country as set up by Ataturk. You cannot see this or feel this. They are doing this secretly."
news.yahoo.com/s/csm/2007...wl_csm/oakp
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 9, 2007 - 8:59 PMComparative Index to Islam : TAQIYA; TAQIYYA
Taqiya, or not showing their faith openly by means of pretense, dissimulation, or concealment, is a special type of LYING which is used by Shi'a Muslims. "Taqiya" (or taqiyyah) is related to the terms "taqwa'" and "taqi'" - all have the root meaning of "guarding" something, in this case, the Islamic faith.
www.answering-islam.de/Main/I...ya.html
-------
Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and destroy kafir countries
This article by Dr. Walid, a top scholar at the Islamic University, exposes our so-called secular Indian Muslims. By the doctrine of Al-Taqiyah, Muslims dominate crime syndicates, increase population by massive Bangladeshi infiltration and make temporary alliances with Dalits, Christians, etc.
In the early years of the Islamic conquest of the Arabian peninsula and in the Fatah (Arab-Islamic invasion and conquest of the upper Middle East and the outside world), a Muslim concept was devised to achieve success against the enemy (non Muslims), Al-Taqiyah. Al-Taqiyah, from the verb Ittaqu, means linguistically dodge the threat. Politically it means simulate whatever status you need in order to win the war against the enemy ...
www.geocities.com/bharatvar...kafirs.htm
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, May 10, 2007 - 8:44 AM
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 11, 2007 - 2:08 PMI could actually care less in the short term about Islam. More people die everyday from the vagaries of our world imposed economic system than from this.
When it gets right down to it, if it takes getting people to turn humanistic oriented and pay attention to what is happening to our habitat, I say nuke the following sites:
New York Stock Exchange
World Bank headquarters
Bethlehem
Mecca
Detroit (because of the RoboCop movies, its now a holy place)
Think of it like having a gangrenous toe amputated. It hurts, but eventually you are far better off. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 11, 2007 - 2:48 PMCould you source some of your bullshit? Maybe educate rather than iratiate? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, May 13, 2007 - 3:59 PMInternational Campaign Against Sharia Law
"Who are we?
The Campaign Against Sharia Court in Canada consists of independent individuals and members of various organizations.
We believe that all people who live in Canada are citizen with equal rights, and should live according to the same social laws and norms. We do not divide society into cultural, religions, national, racial groups. We stand for equal and universal laws for all humanity irrespective of sex, race, ethnicity, etc.
The International Campaign Against Sharia Court in Canada opposes the Ontario Arbitration Act 1991 which recognizes the Islamic Court in Canada under the pretext of “religious freedom,” “tolerance” and cultural sensitivity.
We call on all individuals and progressive organizations to join the International Campaign Against Shari’a Court in Canada.
We demand:
· Separation of religion from the content of the Canadian justice system
We demand:
· That all family disputes be resolved in the Canadian secular court system and not by arbitrators outside of court regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion.
Homa Arjomand
The coordinator of the Campaign
www.nosharia.com
; -
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 9:24 AMIslam is innocent - it is "peaceful" & "beautiful". "It's not the religion, it's the interpretation & implementation by a few extremists"
Right, whatever...
This video is an absolute MUST SEE -. It includes an intro with Jerry Falwell & info on Islam/Muslims...just when I thought it couldn't get worse, a nightmare unfolds before my eyes...
From Bill Moyers Journal
May 18, 2007
Bruce Bawer Ten years ago in his book STEALING JESUS, Bruce Bawer, a gay, Christian man of faith, warned that Christian Conservatives had hijacked Jesus' message of love and replaced it with a narrow minded legalism. He left America for Europe to escape fundamentalist bigotry, but what he found instead may surprise you."
www.pbs.org/moyers/journ...7/watch3.html
---------------------------------
'Behead Those Who Insult Islam'
"The images on this site are VERY disturbing, especially those of the children attacked, raped and killed by Chechen Muslims."
www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/30.htm
* Be sure to check out the 'gallery' for photos
-----
40% of Muslims in Britain want Sharia Law.
"While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within"
by Bruce Bawer
From Publishers Weekly
Having recently published an indictment of Christian fundamentalist intolerance in the U.S. (Stealing Jesus), New York native Bawer relocated to Europe with his Norwegian partner in 1998 and found an even more dangerous strain of religious and cultural bigotry ensnaring Western Europe. A swarming menace called radical Islam, he writes, rings Europe's cities in smoldering Muslim ghettos, provoking everything from so-called honor killings and political assassinations to the Madrid subway bombings and the massacre of school children in Beslan. Worse, the Taliban-like theocracy Bawer sees looming inside backward immigrant populations resistant to integration flourishes under the protective wing of Western Europe's America-bashing, multicultural, liberal establishment. The latter correspond to the appeasers of Nazi Germany, in Bawer's view, since he believes that radical Islamism is every bit the threat to Western civilization that Nazism was. He scoffs at talk of "understanding" or "dialogue," indeed, at any but the most muscular response hitching Europe ever tighter to the U.S. war on terror. His clash-of-civilizations outlook means real issues often get washed away by sweeping statements designed to tar Europe's Muslims with one irredeemably hostile, welfare-sponging brush, while trading in well-worn stereotypes about virtuous American "realists" and corrupt European "idealists."
www.amazon.com/While-Euro.../0385514727
www.brucebawer.com
-----
"Islam: What the West Needs to Know: An examination of Islam, Violence, and the Fate of the Non-Muslim World"
DVD ~ Robert Spencer
www.jihadwatch.org
-----
Other books:
"Religion of Peace?: Islam's War Against the World"
by Gregory M. Davis
"Because They Hate: A Survivor of Islamic Terror Warns America"
by Brigitte Gabriel -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 1:51 PMI saw Brigitte Gabriel on C-SPAN a couple of months ago, and what she said made it sound as if Muslims are somehow less moral when dealing with non-Muslims.
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, May 24, 2007 - 3:11 PMThis is true. There's a sort of 'get out clause' in Islam, according to my Persian-friend-with-a-doctorate that means they don't have to hold to promises or deals with non-muslims. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 25, 2007 - 3:12 AMActually, I forget what it is called, but it is sort of true. It is actually part of Shia Islam. Supposedly instituted in self-defense against attacking Sunnis. So many Shiite men were killed in fighting that they also created a sort of temporary marriage, so widows could get laid, or so they say. Sounds almost progressive to me. Makes sense that you got it from a Persian friend, as Persians are mostly Shiite. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: The Truth About Islam
Fri, May 25, 2007 - 3:48 AMhis family are members of some even smaller sect of islam whose name I can't even remember any more. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sat, May 26, 2007 - 9:31 AM"Muslim Takeover of Europe and America?" blog & VIDEO
"The following video records a Muslim leader - Libya's Qaddafi/Gaddafi - discussing the 100 million Muslims now or soon to be in the European Union, and how Europe will be an Islamic state within "a few decades."
Gaddafi also relates the plot to overtake America as well, saying:
"Europe is in a predicament, and so is America. They should agree to become Islamic in the course of time or else declare war on the Muslims."
tbknews.blogspot.com/2007/05...ml#links
;
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, February 7, 2008 - 11:32 AMA post from a friend ...
[quote]"Sharia law 'unavoidable' in Britain: leader of Anglican church"
- yahoo news
news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2008...s.Gk_x0bBAF
For all of this wretched, pathetic, accommodationist attitude, there are a lot of tolerant, liberal Europeans that are increasingly pissed off about this; I personally know several. If this kind of BS continues, there will be a culture war, and probably a violent one.
The absolute refusal of certain Muslim groups to integrate into European society is a problem that must be addressed, and the current burying-the-heads-in-sand attitude of European governments will have disastrous consequences.
Appeasement of toxic ideologies never works: just ask Neville Chamberlain...[/quote]
UK to extradite Islamic preacher -
"LONDON - Britain's Home Office on Thursday approved the extradition of an Islamic preacher who is accused of trying to establish a terrorist training camp in Oregon, a spokesman said."
"Al-Masri already has been sentenced to seven years' imprisonment in Britain for fomenting racial hatred and urging his followers to kill non-Muslims."
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080...YsABA.ROrgF
"Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice"
ayaanhirsiali.org
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, February 11, 2008 - 12:12 PMWhites to be minority in US by 2050: study
Feb-11-08
“WASHINGTON (AFP) - Immigration will drive the population of the United States sharply upward between now and 2050, and will push whites into a minority, projections by the Pew Research Center showed Monday.
“If current trends continue, the population of the United States will rise to 438 million in 2050, from 296 million in 2005,” an increase of nearly 50 percent, the study by the Washington-based think-tank said.
More than 80 percent of the increase will be due to immigrants arriving in the country and their US-born children, who will make up nearly one in five Americans by 2050 compared with one in eight in 2005, it said.
Whites, who currently make up around two-thirds of the US population, will become a minority (47 percent) by 2050, the report said.
The Hispanic population, currently the largest minority group, will triple in size and double in percentage terms from 14 percent in 2005 to 29 percent in 2050, the report said.
The Asian population will roughly double in percentage terms, from five percent to nine percent, while the black population will remain static at around 13 percent.
The projections are based on trends over the past 50 years, during which legal and illegal immigration have played an increasing role in US population growth, the report said.
From 1960 to 2005, new immigrants and their US-born descendants accounted for 51 percent of population increase, and for 58 percent from 1980 to 2005, the report said.
But, the report warned, “possible future changes in immigration policy” could impact the projections.
Illegal immigration has become a top issue in the race for the US presidency, especially among Republican candidates, most of whom favor of a crackdown.”
news.yahoo.com/s/afp/2008...ationethnic
-- yahoo news -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, February 11, 2008 - 12:20 PMWho says America has to be majority white for all time? Things change, populations move. I happen to have white skin and am perfectly comfortable with the fact that we may one day be in the minority in the U.S. History marches on. -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, February 11, 2008 - 8:13 PMgood point, maybe soon *WE* can also be the ILLEGALS - would they give us all the same benefits we've given all of the minorities? -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, February 11, 2008 - 10:34 PMChopper,
???
Based on comments like this, one can make a couple of inferences about your perspective:
1. minority = illegal
2. minority benefits > majority benefits
... neither of which is accurate at all, and both of which carry a certain ugliness about them. Surely you don't mean this ...
Regards,
John, who likes to think that people (_especially_ those calling themselves "humanists") are better than this ...
Falling You - exploring the beauty of voice and sound
www.fallingyou.com
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Mon, February 11, 2008 - 11:01 PMIt was a sarcastic comment John. the post above mentions immigration and we know that ILLEGALS are certainly making demands even though they are not legal citizens of the US. The US has the softest illegal immigration on the planet - have you seen the Mexican constitution? US citizens would not be given the same benefits if the roles were reversed. So there is actually some truth to my comment.
Mexican Constitution:
1) Foreigners may not participate in political affairs in any way. (Article 33)
2) Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners for employment, and Mexicans citizenship by birth is considered indispensable for certain jobs such as airline crews, military officers, chiefs of seaports and airports. (Article 32)
3) Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization may acquire ownership of land, water or their appurtenances (Article 27)
4) Any Mexican private citizen may arrest someone committing a crime such as an alien in the country illegally and hand him or her over to authorities for prosecution (Article 16)
5) Immigrants may not become lawmakers, cabinet officers, or a Supreme Court Justice, or even a clergyman, but must be a native born Mexican. (Articles 55, 91, 95 and 130)
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Tue, February 12, 2008 - 9:57 PMEver heard of Pat Condell? This just in ... " Sharia fiasco" video - blog.myspace.com/index.cfm -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Wed, February 13, 2008 - 11:17 AMSurely none of these Muslim radicals would ever even think to try and sneak into the US ILLEGALLY, right?
islamwatchers.blogspot.com -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Tue, March 11, 2008 - 6:31 AMHow Islam will dominate the world
tinyurl.com/2jfko7
"THIS IS A MUST READ FOR EVERYONE IN THE WORLD WHO CARES ABOUT THEIR
FREEDOM!
We are slated to be conquered by Muslims. This "secret" is so well
known that Muslim bloggers are setting out the plot in detail. If you
think this is a joke, think again. This plot is well financed, and, as
we can see from this Muslim's blog post, any means will be used to
bring it about, including slaughter. As this barbarian points out, the
vast majority of human beings will not accept Islam - thank God!
(irony) - but Islam will be forced upon us all anyway.
I have run this site through anonymouse.org so that your IP will not
end up in the logs of this blog owner, to be used by these potential
enslavers of mankind. This feature may slow down the loading of this
site, but it is absolutely essential that no one go there without using
this anonymizer.
How Islam will dominate the world
tinyurl.com/2jfko7
All of the most well known tactics are laid out there, including the
verses from the Koran that are being used to create and rally an army
of hundreds of millions of violent Musbots worldwide. If you think
that sound scary, you are right. And such is the power of religious
brainwashing that these minions can be induced easily to murder their
fellow human beings in the name of God.
In reading this site, you are looking right into the (absolutely evil)
mind of the Muslim fanatic who has declared eternal warfare on the free
world.
Forewarned is forearmed.
"If the Muslims are unable to convince their people (e.g. through
peaceful da’wah) to embrace Islam and implement the Sharee’ah, it then
becomes an obligation upon them to make hijrah and unite (build their
own community and execute the Sharee’ah over themselves) and then rise
against the government by force at a later date, regardless of whether
they are the majority or the minority."
tinyurl.com/2jfko7
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, April 6, 2008 - 1:15 PMWhile billions are being spent spreading the fundamentalist Islamic cancer around the world, people in Egypt are starving.
Hopefully, this will be a wake up call that ISLAM IS AN OPPRESSION, NOT THE ANSWER TO THE WORLD'S PROBLEMS.
Al Azhar spends $10 billion on Islam while Egyptians can't find bread
April 05 2008
europenews.dk/en/node/9031
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Thu, April 24, 2008 - 1:18 PM -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Sun, May 4, 2008 - 10:31 AM"Islam and Dhimmitude" by Bat Ye'or
"In this new study of the legal and social condition of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule (the dhimmis), Bat Ye’or examines various religious and historical sources, using the new term “dhimmitude” to describe their common history and legal status. Some of these laws derive from the special status institutionalized by the Church Fathers for Jews; once Islamized, these laws were incorporated into Muslim jurisprudence applicable for Christians and Jews alike. Dhimmitude is thus discussed from the perspective of Muslim theology, and also in regard to divergent Christian attitudes to Jews and Zionism."
www.dhimmi.org/New.html
-----------
She also has several other great books including: "Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis"
“This is a provocative and disturbing book. With all the drama of a master writer, Bat Ye’or presents a wide range of historical and contemporary documents and facts to tell the story of how the European Union is being subverted by Islamic hostility to the very ethics and values of Europe itself. Readers who seek a fair resolution of the Arab-Israel conflict will be shocked by the evidence produced in these pages of unfair pressures and deliberate distortions. Europe’s independence of spirit is shown in the process of being undermined. This book challenges the current demonization of Israel and should be essential reading (and re-reading) for everyone interested in true peace in the Middle East. It is also a warning to Europe not to allow the anti-American and anti-Israel pressures of Islam to subvert Europe’s true values: vibrant democracy, humanitarian free thinking, and social fair dealing.”
-- Sir Martin Gilbert
www.dhimmi.org
;
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Tue, May 12, 2009 - 9:26 AMNothing to see here - whatever you do, * DO NOT* watch these videos
Muslim Demographics
www.youtube.com/watch
Islamification: an Infidel Warning!
www.youtube.com/watch
; -
-
Re: The Truth About Islam
Tue, May 12, 2009 - 1:32 PMI'm sorry. Did someone say something?
-